Page 268 - Glucose Monitoring Devices
P. 268

CHAPTER


                  Predictive low glucose

                  suspend systems                                    14




                                                                1
                                            Gregory P. Forlenza, MD , Laya Ekhlaspour, MD 2
                  1
                   Assistant Professor, Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, United
                         2
                    States; Instructor, Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
                  Introduction

                  Hypoglycemia and fear of hypoglycemia have long been the major limiters to
                  improved glycemic control via reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for patients
                  with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial famously
                  highlighted the tradeoff between improved HbA1c and increased incidence of severe
                  hypoglycemia [1e3]. For decades, the assumption among clinicians and patients
                  had been that one must endure a certain amount of hypoglycemia to have adequate
                  glycemic control. Without commercially available and reliable continuous glucose
                  monitoring (CGM) systems, hypoglycemia was generally identified solely by symp-
                  toms among those without hypoglycemia unawareness. Other identification and
                  potential prevention was achieved via routine scheduled self-monitoring of blood
                  glucose (SMBG) testing. This approach created burden and anxiety especially
                  during the overnight period when symptoms of hypoglycemia would not be present.
                     The physiology around hypoglycemia in patients with T1D is a well-studied
                  phenomenon. The normal physiological response to hypoglycemia involves the
                  shutoff of endogenous insulin production followed by counterregulation with the
                  release of glucagon, cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and growth hormone
                  [4]. In T1D, the counterregulatory response can become altered, likely due to
                  repeated exposure to hypoglycemia [5]. In severe cases, hypoglycemia regulation
                  can become so disrupted that patients experience hypoglycemia unawareness
                  contributing to a viscous cycle of recurrent severe hypoglycemia and decreased
                  hypoglycemia awareness [6]. Hypoglycemia responsiveness is also inherently
                  impaired during sleep as has been documented by decreased epinephrine and
                  increased arousal threshold in some studies [7,8].
                     Ingrowingchildren,hypoglycemiadparticularlyrecurrentseverehypoglycemiad
                  can negatively impact neurocognitive development. A negative impact on memory,
                  learning, intelligence, and verbal fluency has been documented in T1D children with
                  recurrent severe hypoglycemia compared to T1D children who do not experience
                  severe hypoglycemia [9]. Similarly, recurrent severe hypoglycemia has been docu-
                  mented to negatively impact spatial memory, particularly in young children [10].
                  Both electroencephalogram and magnetic resonance imaging have demonstrated

                  Glucose Monitoring Devices. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816714-4.00014-4  275
                  Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273