Page 278 - Glucose Monitoring Devices
P. 278

References    285





                  Summary and conclusions
                  Tight glycemic management is challenging because of an increased risk for hypo-
                  glycemia, which can result in seizures, coma or other serious complications. Fear
                  of hypoglycemia is a significant obstacle for optimal glycemic control for both
                  patients with T1D and their families. To optimize blood glucose control, automated
                  insulin delivery systems were introduced. Following the introduction of LGS
                  systems, PLGS systems were successful in the reduction of hypoglycemic episodes.
                     In this chapter, we reviewed the development of the algorithms that automati-
                  cally suspend insulin delivery to minimize the number and duration of hypoglyce-
                  mic episodes. Both Medtronic PLGS system (MiniMed 640G) and Tandem
                  Basal-IQ have been tested in clinical trials that showed a significant reduction in
                  hypoglycemia without a significant increase in HbA1c. Moving forward with the
                  advancement in automated insulin delivery and hybrid closed-loop systems, reduc-
                  tion of nocturnal hypoglycemia, improvement in the overnight glycemic control, and
                  increase in overnight time in the range have been the main advantages for the pa-
                  tients with T1D. The controller in hybrid closed-loop systems adjusts insulin dosing
                  based on data from CGM devices. A meal announcement is still a requirement. The
                  management of postprandial glucose excursions and postexercise hypoglycemia
                  remain challenging. Further studies testing a fully closed-loop system to assess
                  the safety and efficacy of the systems in a free-living environment is necessary.



                  References
                   [1] The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of
                      long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control
                      and Complications trial Research Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1993;
                      329(14):977e86. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199309303291401. PubMed PMID:
                      8366922.
                   [2] Adverse events and their association with treatment regimens in the diabetes control and
                      complications trial. Diabetes Care 1995;18(11):1415e27. Epub 1995/11/01. PubMed
                      PMID: 8722064.
                   [3] Hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control
                      and Complications Trial Research Group. Diabetes 1997;46(2):271e86. Epub 1997/02/
                      01. PubMed PMID: 9000705.
                   [4] Bolli G, de Feo P, Compagnucci P, Cartechini MG, Angeletti G, Santeusanio F,
                      Brunetti P, Gerich JE. Abnormal glucose counterregulation in insulin-dependent dia-
                      betes mellitus. Interaction of anti-insulin antibodies and impaired glucagon and
                      epinephrine secretion. Diabetes 1983;32(2):134e41. Epub 1983/02/01. PubMed
                      PMID: 6337896.
                   [5] Matyka K, Evans M, Lomas J, Cranston I, Macdonald I, Amiel SA. Altered hierarchy of
                      protective responses against severe hypoglycemia in normal aging in healthy men.
                      Diabetes Care 1997;20(2):135e41. Epub 1997/02/01. PubMed PMID: 9118760.
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283