Page 74 - Glucose Monitoring Devices

72 CHAPTER 4 Consequences of SMBG systems inaccuracy

[5] Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Rattanasookchit S. Meta-analysis of the benefits of self-
monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients: an
update. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2009;11(12):775e84.
[6] Oki JC, Flora DL, Isley WL. Frequency and impact of SMBG on glycemic control in
patients with NIDDM in an urban teaching hospital clinic. The Diabetes Educator
1997;23(4):419e24.
[7] Bassili A, Omar M, Tognoni G. The adequacy of diabetic care for children in a devel-
oping country. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2001;53(3):187e99.
[8] Klonoff DC, et al. Investigation of the accuracy of 18 marketed blood glucose monitors.
Diabetes Care 2018;41(8):1681e8.
[9] Klonoff DC, Prahalad P. Performance of cleared blood glucose monitors. Journal of
Diabetes Science and Technology 2015;9(4):895e910.
[10] Freckmann G, Link M, Schmid C, Pleus S, Baumstark A, Haug C. System accuracy
evaluation of different blood glucose monitoring systems following ISO 15197:2013
by using two different comparison methods. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics
2015;17(9):635e48.
[11] Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C. Evaluation of 12
blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement
reproducibility. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2014;16(2):113e22.
[12] Brazg RL, Klaff LJ, Parkin CG. Performance variability of seven commonly used self-
monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2013;7(1):144e52.
[13] Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C. System accuracy
evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose
according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2012;
6(5):1060e75.
[14] Freckmann G, et al. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring sys-
tems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2010;
12(3):221e31.
[15] Heinemann L, Freckmann G. CGM versus FGM; or, continuous glucose monitoring is
not flash glucose monitoring. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2015;9(5):
947e50.
[16] El-Shazly M, et al. Health care for diabetic patients in developing countries. Public
Health 2000;114(4):276e81.
[17] Escalante M, Gagliardino JJ, Guzma ´n JR, Tschiedel B. Call-to-action: timely and
appropriate treatment for people with type 2 diabetes in Latin America. Diabetes
Research and Clinical Practice 2014;104(3):343e52.
[18] Campos-Na ´n ˜ez E, Breton MD. Effect of BGM accuracy on the clinical performance of
CGM: an in-silico study. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2017;11(6):
1196e206.
[19] Heinemann L. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) or Blood Glucose Monitoring
(BGM): interactions and implications. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
2018;12(4):873e9.
[20] Chen ET, Nichols JH, Duh S-H, Hortin G. Performance evaluation of blood glucose
monitoring devices. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2003;5(5):749e68.
[21] Bergenstal RM. Evaluating the accuracy of modern glucose meters. Insulin 2008;3(1):
5e14.