Page 170 - Green Building Through Integrated Design
P. 170

146   INTEGRATED PROJECT MANAGEMENT—COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF GREEN BUILDINGS



                     the various measures proposed for their green building projects. Without a solid quan-
                     tifiable set of metrics to assess a project, teams inevitably begin to see environmental
                     initiatives take a back seat to traditional project forces such as schedule constraints and
                     budget-related issues. I believe that with a well-established framework of vision, goals
                     and life-cycle financial benefits, project teams will be able to better understand the
                     owner’s needs, and owners will be able to make better data-driven decisions.
                       In this chapter, I will focus on the fact that benefiting from the paradigm of green
                     building requires all project stakeholders to understand the goals for which they are
                     striving. In addition, there needs to be in place a project management process that
                     addresses the full range of life-cycle financial benefits. As I’ve pointed out in this
                     book, the foundation of green building success is the  integrated design process.
                     Simply put, the entire team needs to utilize the talents of all disciplines to accurately
                     understand the impacts of green buildings. This chapter presents several examples
                     of LEED project credit analysis and offers an introduction to a cost/benefit method-
                     ology that is critical to the success of any green project. At the end of the chapter, I
                     examine a situation when the individual solutions are combined into a complete
                     project analysis. In this case, the aggregate impact of both soft and hard costs can
                     be analyzed immediately against the long-term benefits of various levels of LEED
                     certification.


                     Introduction to the Environmental

                     Value-Added Method



                     Traditional project delivery methods do not provide a very easy path toward the goal
                     of successfully delivering a green building project. As you’ve learned from various
                     examples presented earlier in this book, when evaluating the cost/benefit components
                     of a green building, the starting point on all projects needs to be a visioning session
                     among project stakeholders. This session should be a focused meeting that allows the
                     project owner or developer to develop a set of goals, that the project design and con-
                     struction team will refer to frequently during the design development process.
                       In the visioning session, the owner should bring the entire stakeholder team
                     together to help participate in the visioning for the project. Sustainability and its
                     application to green building can be defined by the concept of the Triple Bottom
                     Line. The Triple Bottom Line concept is based on concerns in three main areas of
                     impact: planet, profit, and people. Others define the impact areas as environmental,
                     economic, social. If the owner can clearly define what elements of the triple bottom
                     line they are striving for, then the team can more clearly articulate a design path to
                     reach those goals.
                       Many times, project teams start a project with a LEED checklist, but no specific
                     areas of focus. This can lead a team to “shop” for points, in some cases implementing
                     elements that the owner might not have that much interest in, while leaving tougher
                     credits aside. The owner should define for the project team (and for  the project itself)
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175