Page 186 - Green Building Through Integrated Design
P. 186

162   INTEGRATED PROJECT MANAGEMENT—COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF GREEN BUILDINGS



                      TABLE 8.12  CUMULATIVE CASH FLOW TABLE — 5% INFLATION ON BENEFITS
                      (ENERGY COSTS, WATER COSTS, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, AND SO ON)

                        LENGTH
                      OF ANALYSIS      CERTIFIED       SILVER         GOLD        PLATINUM

                       0               $70,500.00    $100,500.00   $145,500.00  $215,500.00
                       1               $36,250.00    $40,250.00    $72,250.00   $132,250.00
                       2               $287.50       $23,012.50    $4,662.50    $44,837.50
                       3               $37,473.13    $89,438.13    $85,420.83   $46,945.63
                       4               $77,121.78    $159,185.03   $170,216.66  $143,317.91
                       5               $118,752.87   $232,419.28   $259,252.49  $244,508.80
                       6               $162,465.51   $309,315.25   $352,740.11  $350,759.24
                       7               $208,363.79   $390,056.01   $450,902.12  $462,422.20
                       8               $256,556.98   $474,833.81   $553,972.23  $79,463.31
                       9               $307,159.83   $563,850.50   $662,195.84  $702,461.48
                      10               $360,292.82   $658,318.03   $775,830.63  $831,609.55




                       When we assume an increase of 5 percent annually on the benefits side, the
                     breakeven years stay the same, but the Gold project, for example, has 30 percent
                     greater benefits over the 10-year planning horizon (Table 8.12). For an institution or
                     large corporation that has a long-term owner-operator perspective, assessing costs and
                     benefits over a 10-year planning horizon is not unusual. When the benefits are known
                     or can be estimated easily, then the issue is not “should we do this,” but “how are we
                     going to pay for it?” In other words, the decisions are financial and not economic in
                     nature, because the economic value is quite clear.


                     Getting Started with Environmental

                     Value-Added Analysis


                     Project teams should begin the green building process by identifying what  Triple
                     Bottom Line goals the project owner wants most. This ensures that the project team
                     understands the owner’s point of view for what will determine a successful project.
                     Next the team should evaluate the various LEED credits and sustainable design solu-
                     tions that support the owner’s programmatic needs for the facility. Each item should
                     be evaluated against the owners’ EVA Log. The team should evaluate all impacts,
                     examining soft and hard cost impacts and life-cycle benefits for each and every
                     credit/solution on the project. The team should understand and review the net effects
                     of all. The effects of inflation factors on life-cycle operations’ costs play a vital role in
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191