Page 43 - Green Building Through Integrated Design
P. 43

HIGH-PERFORMANCE BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS  21



                      have a right to ask, “Against what standard are you measuring your design, and
                      how are you going to prove it?” By following the LEED guidelines, but not doing
                      the paperwork, the practical effect is that there’s a lot less commitment to the final
                      outcome.


                      COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDINGS
                      A green building uses design and construction practices that significantly reduce or
                      eliminate the negative impact of buildings on the environment and occupants. In the
                      LEED system, these practices include building location, water and energy use, envi-
                      ronmentally preferable purchasing and waste management activities, improved
                      indoor environmental quality and a “continuous improvement” approach to green
                      building innovations. Though owned by the USGBC, the LEED rating system is a
                      publicly available document;* it has an extensive committee structure charged with
                      keeping it current and improving it over time.  The current iteration is known as
                      LEED version 2.2. The LEED v3 system (expected in 2009) plans to have greater
                      flexibility for building teams to consider regional issues, a stronger focus on life-
                      cycle assessment and a better way to handle alternative approaches to designing “low
                      carbon” buildings.
                        Table 2.2 shows the six major categories in the LEED-NC rating system for new
                      and renovated commercial and institutional buildings, mid-rise and high-rise resi-
                      dential towers. At first thought, many people think of a green building as one that
                      primarily uses less energy and possibly uses recycled-content materials. Looking at
                      the entire LEED rating system, one can see that the categories of concern are much
                      broader and more comprehensive than just saving energy. Practitioners in the
                      design, development, and construction industry in the United States and Canada
                      have embraced this system over all other competitors. In this respect, it’s fairly easy
                      to say, “It isn’t a green building (in the United States and Canada) if it’s not LEED
                      certified.”
                        From the standpoint of commercial buildings, the LEED rating system is heav-
                      ily weighted toward saving energy, saving water, and providing higher levels of
                      indoor environmental quality. However, it’s virtually impossible to get a LEED
                      Gold or Platinum rating without paying close attention to the sustainable site crite-
                      ria and to the need to conserve materials and resources. In this sense, I find that
                      LEED Gold and Platinum projects are fairly balanced across all five main groups
                      of environmental attributes. For example, Table 2.3 shows the LEED scores by cat-
                      egory for the two completed buildings at the Arizona State University Biodesign
                      Institute in Tempe, Arizona. You can easily see that the main difference between the
                      two projects is the very high level of energy savings in the Platinum project, more
                      than 50 percent. †




                      *U.S. Green Building Council [online], www.usgbc.org/leed, accessed July 31, 2008.
                      † David Sokol, “Crossing Boundaries,” Greensource magazine, January 2008, p. 72.
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48