Page 278 -
P. 278

249
                                                                                     V
                                                                       C
                                                                       C h a p t e r   1 2 :  h a p t e r   1 2 :    Vi r t u a l i z a t i o n  i r t u a l i z a t i o n    249

                 Storage Virtualization Solutions
                      Vendors understand the need for streamlined SAN solutions, and they’re introducing new and
                      ever-efficient technologies all the time. In this section, we’ll take a closer look at some of the
                      better SAN solutions out there and talk about how they can help you virtualize your storage.

                      Compellent Storage Center
                      Storage vendors are seeing the benefits of going green and reacting to market pressures to churn
                      out smart products that balance performance, power, and consumption. One such company is
                      Compellent. Compellent offers a number of SAN enhancements with its Compellent Storage
                      Center 4.0. In fact, Compellent is not only concerned with providing an effective, efficient SAN,
                      but is also taking strides to address ecological considerations through its products.
                         The company uses such technologies as the following:
                          •  Automated tiered storage
                          •  Thin provisioning
                          •  Advanced virtualization
                         Compellent notes that a fully featured Storage Center SAN can save companies up to
                      93 percent of the power consumption and power costs of storage when compared to
                      conventional solutions.
                         For instance, the company observes that a typical 20TB storage system configured with
                      RAID 10 and utilized at 50 percent might require 274 enterprise-class disk drives. Using
                      10,000 rpm 146GB drives could consume 6020 watts per year (52,740 kWh). If the company
                      pays $0.10 per kWh to power those drives, it would cost US$26,370 over the drives’ 5-year
                      lifespan.
                         However, a Compellent SAN with its proprietary technologies—thin provisioning,
                      advanced virtualization, and automated tiered storage—might require just 14 of the same
                      enterprise-class disk drives configured at RAID 10, and seven 7200 rpm 750GB SATA storage
                      disks, configured at RAID 5.
                         This configuration would consume just 429 watts—or 3758 kWh—for a total cost of just
                      US$1879 over the drives’ 5-year lifespan.
                         Let’s take a closer look at the technologies Compellent uses to reduce the size of a SAN.

                      Thin Provisioning
                      Compellent’s thin-provisioning software is called Dynamic Capacity, and it helps increase
                      storage utilization, thus lowering the overall number of drives required for a SAN.   PART V
                         Dynamic Capacity allocates storage only when the data is written to the disk, instead of
                      preallocating storage capacity to volumes before they are used. The result is that administrators
                      don’t have to overprovision capacity to plan for future growth.
                         By purchasing and operating fewer disk drives, companies significantly reduce power,
                      cooling, and real estate costs. If you were to just use Dynamic Capacity, you could reduce
                      the number of drives you need by 75 percent.

                      Automated Tiered Storage
                      We talked about the advantages of tiered storage earlier in this section. Although the
                      concept of moving less-often used data to slower, less expensive drives is a great idea, it’s
                      time consuming for IT managers to physically perform.
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283