Page 60 - Grow from Within Mastering Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation
P. 60

Understanding Corporate Entrepreneurship           47


              itability in new directions. The most forward-thinking know
              that if they don’t take the lead, someone else will. In competi-
              tive, global economies, every company runs the risk of obso-
              lescence. Consistently and intentionally building new
              businesses and paths to growth provides one powerful, emerg-
              ing strategy for remaining relevant and prosperous.
                 As risk and reward are correlated, being a corporate entre-
              preneur can also be either a way to the top or a trip to corpo-
              rate Siberia, and which path the entrepreneur is on might not
              be apparent for a while. Through the stories of a range of expe-
              rienced corporate business builders, cases from some of the
              world’s leading companies, and a few failed expeditions, we’ll
              help to prepare you and your company for a successful jour-
              ney. The rest will be up to you.



            Summary


              The myth of the maverick entrepreneur may be dangerously
              misleading, but so too is the contrary notion that there is no
              role within a large corporation for the unique type of person
              who is motivated by the challenge of creating new things. You
              need people who are focused on optimization and process effi-
              ciency, honing things that already exist, and extending and
              defending the core turf. But you also need people who are
              building turfs for the future.
                 The essence of corporate entrepreneurship is the creation of
              new businesses that require substantial and continuous con-
              nections to core competencies in order to reach their full poten-
              tial. But beware of becoming so narrowly focused that
              promising concepts are killed too early, are too broadly ambi-
              tious (e.g., try to change the whole corporate culture), or are
              misaligned with senior management, strategic priorities, or
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65