Page 32 - Handbook of Thermal Analysis of Construction Materials
P. 32

16                        Chapter 1 - Thermoanalytical Techniques


                              Assuming x is constant; dHr/dt = 0 at the peak maximum; d(dx/dT)/dT = 0
                              and reaction order (n) is equal to one, Eq. (10) can be written as:


                                            H  ′ r    E a   AR 
                              Eq. (11)   ln     =  −  − ln     
                                            T  2    RT     E a  

                                             AR 
                                               
                                           
                              where      ln    =  Z (constant )
                                             E a 
                                            H′ r   E a
                              Eq. (12)   ln   2   = −  −  z
                                             T    RT

                                     In a dynamic heating rate approach, the activation energy value, E ,
                                                                                             a
                                                                 2
                              can be calculated from a plot of ln (Hr/T ) versus 1/T, where at least three
                              experiments with different maximum heating rates have been used. The
                              calculation of E  is independent of reaction rate and mechanism. [44]
                                            a
                                     Sichina [49]  reported that although the variable heating rate ap-
                              proach offers some advantages in improving resolution, care must be taken
                              to ensure that the resulting data is displayed in a correct manner to avoid
                              visual artifacts. To demonstrate the importance of time and temperature in
                              the variable heating rate approach, he heated copper sulfate pentahydrate
                              using a series of heating ramps coupled with isothermal holds. His purpose
                              was to produce data compression and decompression regions.
                                     Figure 3 displays the TG curve using this approach as a function of
                              temperature. Between room temperature and 100°C, the TG curve in Fig.
                              3 appears to have four well-resolved weight losses presumably resulting
                              from the water of hydration. Previous research [50]  has reported that by using
                              variable heating rates, five well-defined waters of hydration can be identi-
                              fied in CuSO 5H O.
                                         4   2
                                     Sichina [49]  reported that the four well-resolved weight losses ob-
                              served in Fig. 3 are an artifact because a plot of the same data as a function
                              of time (Fig. 4) only shows two weight losses. Furthermore, he plotted the
                              first weight loss (%), which stoichiometrically corresponds to simulta-
                              neous evolution of two waters, as a function of time (Fig. 5). Hence, in this
                              plot, all data are equally spaced.  However, if the same weight loss is
                              plotted as a function of temperature (Fig. 6), data compression and decom-
                              pression occur. As a result, the TG curve appears to have two resolved
                              events due to two waters of hydration. This was attributed to a visual
                              artifact.
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37