Page 212 - Communication Cultural and Media Studies The Key Concepts
P. 212

REALITY TV

               this banner. Some who have investigated its conventions suggest that
               the terms ‘factual television’ (see Dovey, 2001) or ‘popular factual
               entertainment’ (see Roscoe, 2001) do more justice to a type of
               programming that encompasses everything from confrontational chat
               shows to surveillance entertainment such as Big Brother and Survivor.
                  Examples of reality TV can be traced to the early 1990s and the
               emergence of programmes that traded on the reality of the everyday
               tasks of the emergency services. Shows such as Cops and 999 often
               masqueraded as investigative journalism and found justification and
               legitimation by using the rhetoric of ‘public service’ to describe their
               role (Roscoe, 2001: 10). This is most evident in shows such as Cops,
               which transformed the ‘crime-stoppers’ genre into drama.
                  Another emergent form of reality TV is docu-soap. This hybrid
               differs from documentary in that it prioritises entertainment over
               social commentary (Bruzzi, 2001: 132). It shares with other ‘reality’
               formats the presentation of the everyday as entertainment. One
               innovation arising from this development is that ‘ordinary people’ are
               doing the talking – ‘real’ folk get to be stars (Roscoe, 2001: 11).
                  Some of the criticism aimed at this type of programming stems
               from the loss of the expert’s role. The rise of shows that foreground
               ordinary people is characterised as dumbing down. Typical of such
               attacks, Kronig (2000: 47) argues that reality TV is a ‘triumph of
               emotional sensationalism over serious issues from politics to science’,
               echoing the cry that documentary film and its supposed representa-
               tion of the real are being forsaken in favour of this obviously ‘unreal’
               genre.
                  Reality TV makes no attempt to hide the extent to which reality is
               a product of its production values, which have increased in proportion
               to the genre’s popularity (for example, Big Brother, Survivor, Popstars).
               Indeed, Roscoe argues that the audience of these shows are well aware
               of their artificial nature, and that part of the pleasure for viewers is in
               evaluating the performance of participants – a pleasure that is
               particularly rewarding during moments when the performance breaks
               down (2001: 14). It is at such moments that a different kind of ‘reality’
               pokes through. Tears, back-stabbing, injury and facial expression in the
               moment of defeat are all examples of what Roscoe calls ‘flickers of
               authenticity’.
                  Combining elements of, for example, documentary, soap opera and
               quiz shows, reality TV demonstrates the continuum of television
               formats and the hybridity of programming. Further research in the
               area should therefore seek to understand howthese changes are related



                                           197
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217