Page 205 - Geology and Geochemistry of Oil and Gas
P. 205

174                       CLASSIFICATIONS OF OIL AND GAS ACCUMULATIONS

             shape, lateral extent, and height in relation with the positions of possible hydro-
             carbon cross-flows, and
             type of the barrier restricting the migration, which at the same time defines the
             accumulation boundaries.
             Any trap classification reflecting these conditions can be considered practical.
             The accumulation of hydrocarbons, filling the trap, is an elementary accumula-
           tion of hydrocarbons, the major parameters of which are their quality and quantity
           and the accumulated energy. Besides, additional parameters must provide necessary
           information for a successful appraisal and subsequent development of the accumu-
           lation. Such parameters include the degree to which the traps are filled and the
           nature of the gas–oil–water contacts. The former depends on the environment of
           trap formation and the tectonic evolution of the basin. In many cases, certain pat-
           terns in the degree to which the traps are filled can be identified in a basin for a
           particular stratigraphic interval. This may be successfully used in exploration and
           estimation of resources of a particular stratigraphic sequence.
             The locations of the gas–oil–water contacts are important during the exploration
           and development phases. The knowledge of the tilt of oil–water contact, if present,
           may prevent drilling of unnecessary wells. The task gets more complicated if there
           are no definite contacts, replaced by transitional zones. Besides, the contour must be
           closed (also against a barrier).
             If the amount of hydrocarbons in an accumulation is sufficient to conduct pro-
           duction, the accumulation is called commercial. This concept is uncertain and de-
           pends on many factors, such as the geographic location, available infrastructure,
           depth, quality of hydrocarbons, and the presence of beneficial or harmful admix-
           tures.
             Most common classifications of the size of oil and gas accumulations in the US
           and Russia are presented in Table 10.1. This table shows that in the US greater effort
           is devoted to the development of small accumulations than in Russia. The reasons
           for that include the following:
           1. A more advanced oil and gas-producing equipment in the US enables to produce
             economically from the smaller accumulations.
           2. Smaller accumulations are neglected in Russia, and only larger accumulations are
             developed because of economics and lower demand of oil than in US.
             The classification of the accumulations by the average rate of production is also
           quantitative. Kontorovich et al. (1975), for example, proposed the classification
           presented in Table 10.2.
             The class boundaries are tentative and may be changed to fit a specific situation
           for a particular petroliferous province. It is important to keep in mind the fact
           that the flow rates reflect not only the natural conditions of the accumulation
           (lithology, fluid properties, energy of accumulation, etc.), but also the technology
           (development techniques, well facilities, etc.). Besides, the boundary between the
           low-rate and non-commercial classes is determined by the economical–technical
           reasons. The price of the oil and gas determines the position of such boundary, and
           the political situation (e.g., embargo) may impose the development of even very
           small accumulations.
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210