Page 597 - Handbook Of Integral Equations
P. 597

Hence, instead of Eq. (11) we obtain

                                                              4 4
                                                        2 2

                                        y 2 (x)=1 +  1/2   1 – x t +  1 2  x t y 2 (t) dt.  (12)
                                                 0
               Therefore,
                                                                4
                                                           2
                                            y 2 (x)=1 + A 1 + A 2 x + A 3 x ,              (13)
               where
                                   1/2             1/2             1   1/2

                                                       2
                                                                          4
                             A 1 =   y 2 (x) dx,  A 2 = –  x y 2 (x) dx,  A 3 =  x y 2 (x) dx.  (14)
                                  0                0               2  0
                   From (13) and (14) we obtain a system of three equations with three unknowns; to the fourth decimal place, the solution
               is
                                        A 1 = 0.9930,  A 2 = –0.0833,  A 3 = 0.0007.
               Hence,
                                                                4
                                                        2
                                  y(x) ≈ y 2 (x) = 1.9930 – 0.0833 x + 0.0007 x ,  0 ≤ x ≤  1 .  (15)
                                                                          2
                   An error estimate for the approximate solution (15) can be performed by formula (10).
                •
                 References for Section 11.13: L. V. Kantorovich and V. I. Krylov (1958), S. G. Mikhlin (1960), B. P. Demidovich,
               I. A. Maron, and E. Z. Shuvalova (1963), M. L. Krasnov, A. I. Kiselev, and G. I. Makarenko (1971).
               11.14. The Bateman Method
                 11.14-1. The General Scheme of the Method
               In some cases it is useful, instead of replacing a given kernel by a degenerate kernel, to represent
               the given kernel approximately as the sum of a kernel whose resolvent is known and a degenerate
               kernel. For the latter, the resolvent can be written out in a closed form.
                   Consider the Fredholm integral equation of the second kind
                                                   b

                                          y(x) – λ  k(x, t)y(t) dt = f(x)                   (1)
                                                  a
               with kernel k(x, t) whose resolvent r(x, t; λ) is known; thus, the solution of (1) can be represented
               in the form
                                                        b
                                        y(x)= f(x)+ λ   r(x, t; λ)f(t) dt.                  (2)
                                                      a
               Then, for the integral equation with kernel

                                   k(x, t)  g 1 (x)  ··· g n (x)          a 11  a 12  ···  a 1n

                             1     h 1 (t)  a 11  ···  a 1n              a 21  a 22  ···  a 2n
                  K(x, t)=          .     .    .     .     ,  ∆(a ij )=     .  .  .   .     ,  (3)
                          ∆(a ij )     . .  . .  . .  . .              .    . .  . .  .
                                                                       .
                                                                                      .
                                  h n (t)  a n1  ···  a nn            a n1  a n2  ··· a nn

               where g k (x) and h k (t)(k =1, ... , n) are arbitrary functions and a ij (i, j =1, ... , n) are arbitrary
               numbers, the resolvent has the form

                                                  r(x, t; λ)  ϕ 1 (x)  ···  ϕ n (x)

                                         1        ψ 1 (t)  a 11 + λb 11  ···  a 1n + λb 1n
                          R(x, t; λ)=               .         .      .       .       ,      (4)
                                    ∆(a ij + λb ij )     . .  . .    . .     . .

                                                  ψ n (t)  a n1 + λb n1  ··· a nn + λb nn

               where
                                       b                                 b

                      ϕ k (x)= g k (x)+ λ  r(x, t; λ)g k (t) dt,  ψ k (x)= h k (x)+ λ  r(x, t; λ)h k (t) dt,
                                      a                                 a                   (5)
                                           b

                                    b ij =  g j (x)h i (x) dx,  k, i, j =1, ... , n.
                                          a
                 © 1998 by CRC Press LLC








               © 1998 by CRC Press LLC
                                                                                                             Page 580
   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602