Page 684 - Handbook Of Integral Equations
P. 684

can always be calculated for the approximate solution ˜y(x), which is known on the interval a ≤ x ≤ x k
               and was previously obtained for k – 1 parts. The initial value y(a) of the desired solution can be
               found by an auxiliary method or is assumed to be given.
                   To solve Eq. (23), representation (22) is applied, and the free parameters A i (i =1, ... , m) can
               be defined from the condition that the residuals vanish:

                                      x k,j

                          ε(A i , x k,j )=  K x k,j , t, Φ(t, A 1 , ... , A m ) dt – f(x k,j ) – Ψ k (x k,j ),  (25)
                                      x k
               where the x k,j (j =1, ... , m) are the nodes that correspond to the partition of the interval [x k , x k+1 ]
               into m parts (subintervals). System (25) is a system of m equations for A 1 , ... , A m .
                   For convenience of the calculations, it is reasonable to present the desired solution on any part
               as a polynomial
                                                     m

                                               ˜ y(x)=  A i ϕ i (x),                       (26)
                                                     i=1
               where the ϕ i (x) are linearly independent coordinate functions. For the functions ϕ i (x), power and
               trigonometric polynomials are frequently used; for instance, ϕ i (x)= x i–1 .
                   In applications, the concrete form of the functions ϕ i (x) in formula (26), as well as the form of
               the functions Φ in (20), can sometimes be given on the basis of physical reasoning or defined by the
               structure of the solution of a simpler model equation.


                 14.2-6. The Quadrature Method

               To solve a nonlinear Volterra equation, we can apply the method based on the use of quadrature
               formulas. The procedure of constructing the approximate system of equations is the same as in the
               linear case (see Subsection 9.10-1).

                ◦
               1 . We consider the nonlinear Volterra equation of the second kind in the Urysohn form
                                                 x


                                         y(x) –   K x, t, y(t) dt = f(x)                   (27)
                                                a

               on an interval a ≤ x ≤ b. Assume that K x, t, y(t) and f(x) are continuous functions.
                   From Eq. (27) we find that y(a)= f(a). Let us choose a constant integration step h and consider
               the discrete set of points x i = a + h(i – 1), where i =1, ... , n.For x = x i , Eq. (27) becomes

                                                x i

                                        y(x i ) –  K x i , t, y(t) dt = f(x i ).           (28)
                                               a
                   Applying the quadrature formula (see Subsection 8.7-1) to the integral in (28), choosing x j
               (j =1, ... , i) to be the nodes in t, and neglecting the truncation error, we arrive at the following
               system of nonlinear algebraic (or transcendental) equations:
                                               i

                                 y 1 = f 1 ,  y i –  A ij K ij (y j )= f i ,  i =2, ... , n,  (29)
                                              j=1
               where the A ij are the coefficients of the quadrature formula on the interval [a, x i ], the y i are the
               approximate values of the solution y(x) at the nodes x i , f i = f(x i ), and K ij (y j )= K(x i , t j , y j ).
                   Relations (29) can be rewritten as a sequence of recurrent nonlinear equations,
                                                       i–1

                            y 1 = f 1 ,  y i – A ii K ii (y i )= f i +  A ij K ij (y j ),  i =2, ... , n,  (30)
                                                       j=1
               for the approximate values of the desired solution at the nodes.




                 © 1998 by CRC Press LLC








               © 1998 by CRC Press LLC
                                                                                                             Page 667
   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689