Page 49 - Handbook of Adhesion Promoters

42 Mechanisms of Adhesion

Figure 2.47. Topographic (a) and fluorescent (b) SNOM acquisitions of two cells initiating cell-cell contact.
Arrows indicate filopodia extending across the intercellular region, I, whilst arrowheads indicate those making
contact with opposing filopodia. Punctate E-cadherin clusters are circled. [Adapted, by permission, from Walker,
K-AD; Doak, SH; Dunstan, PR, Ultramicroscopy, 111, 1200-5, 2011.]

dia have functional roles in motility, guidance during cell migration, and cell-to-cell
90
adhesion.
Surface contamination caused by insects on laminar flow on aeroplane wing surfaces
91
results in an increase in drag and fuel consumption. The adhered insect residue can dis-
91
rupt the flow, by causing a transition from laminar to turbulent. Superhydrophobic and
self-cleaning surfaces are used in self-cleaning windows, windshields, solar panels, and on
o
anti-fouling surfaces (surfaces that exhibit water contact angles exceeding 150 are con-
91
sidered superhydrophobic). A surface which exhibited a low roughness combined with a
91
low sliding angle gave required performance. The dynamics of an insect impact event
and its influence on the wetting and adhesion mechanisms of insect residue were also
91
important factors in the selection of coating.
REFERENCES
nd
1 Ebnesajjad, S; Ebnesajjad, C, Surface Treatment of Materials for Adhesive Bonding, 2 Ed.,
William Andrew, 2013, pp. 77-91.
2 Mousa, S; Kim, G-Y, J. Mater. Process Technol., 222, 84-90, 2015.]
3 Horvath, B; Kawakita, J; Chikyow, T, Appl. Surf. Sci., 384, 492-6, 2016.
4 Ye, M; Delplancke, JL; Berton, G; Segers, L; Winand, R, Surf. Coat. Technol., 105, 184-8, 1998.
5 Njuhovic, E; Brau, M; Wolff-Fabris, F; Starzynski, K; Altstadt, V, Composites, B66, 443-52, 2014.
6 Gude, MR; Prolongo, SG; Ureña, A, Surf. Coat. Technol., 207, 602-7, 2012.
7 Sancaktar; E, Gomatam, R, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 15 (1), 97–117, 2001.
8 B a l d a n , A , Int. J. Adh. Adh., 38, 95-116, 2012.
9 Juárez-Moreno, JA; Brito-Argáez, LG; Ávila-Ortega, A;. Oliva, AI; Avilés, F; Cauich-Rodríguez, JV,
Int. J. Adh. Adh., in press, 2017.
10 Matsuzaki, R; Tsukamoto, N; Taniguchi, J, Int. J. Adh. Adh., 68, 124-32, 2016.
11 Yang, L; Hu, J; Xiao, H; Quan, W, Particuology, in press, 2017.
12 Ishizaka, K; Lewis, SR; Lewis, R, Wear, 378-379, 183-97, 2017.
13 Bikerman, JJ. The Science of Adhesive Joints. Academic Press, New York, 1961.
14 Asseko, ACA; Cosson, B; Lafranche, E; Schmidt, F; Le Maoult, Y, Composites, B97, 53-61, 2016.
15 Wool, RP; O’Connor, KM, J. Appl. Phys., 52, 5953-63, 1981.
16 Frederix, C; Beauchene, P; Seguela, R; Lefebvre, JM, Polymer, 54, 11, 2755-63, 2013.
17 Song, J; Batra, A; Rego, JM; Macosco, CW, Prog. Org. Coat., 72, 492-7, 2011.
18 Bruckmoser, K; Resch, K; Kisslinger, T; Lucyshyn, T, Polym. Testing, 45, 122-33, 2015.
19 Jiang, ZX; Meng, LH; Huang, YD; Liu, L; Lu, C, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253, 4338-43, 2007.
20 Sharpe, LH, Schonhorn, H, Adv. Chem. Ser., 8, 189-201, 1964.
21 Watts, JF; Chehimi, MM, Int. J. Adh. Adh., 15, 91-4, 1995.
22 Wypych, G; Cheginets, V; Catalan, J, Handbook of Solvents. Vol. 1, 2nd Ed., Wypych, G, Ed., ChemTec
Publishing, Toronto, 2014, pp. 491-632.