Page 126 - Handbook of Battery Materials
P. 126

94  3 Structural Chemistry of Manganese Dioxide and Related Compounds

                    broadening made the structure determination very complicated. Additionally, a
                    large number of significantly different patterns could be observed, depending
                    strongly on the preparation conditions. Some XRD patterns resembled the diffrac-
                    tograms of pyrolusite, others were similar to the line-rich patterns of ramsdellite
                    samples, and many showed only a few broad peaks, that could be indexed on
                    the basis of hexagonal close packing. A typical XRD pattern of an electrolyti-
                    cally prepared manganese dioxide (EMD sample from ‘Chemetals’) is shown in
                    Figure 3.2.
                      In the early literature this wide variety of different powder patterns led to the
                    distinction between γ , γ , γ ,and ε-MnO 2 [37]. De Wolff [38, 39] was the first to


                    propose a plausible structural model for these phases. The De Wolff model is
                    based on the assumption that the oxygen atoms in γ -MnO 2 are hexagonally close
                    packed. The manganese atoms occupy half of the octahedral voids in this matrix,
                    as in pyrolusite or ramsdellite. The only difference between these two modification
                    is the crystallographic b-axis of the Pnma setting of ramsdellite (see Table 3.1).
                    The atomic arrangements in the a- and c-directions are very similar. β-MnO 2 and
                    ramsdellite differ only in the arrangement of the manganese atoms, which form
                    single chains of edge-sharing octahedra in the β-modification and double chains
                    in ramsdellite.
                      Therefore De Wolff proposed in his model that the crystal structure of γ -MnO 2
                    intergrowth of pyrolusite and ramsdellite domains. An idealized section of the
                    γ -MnO 2 intergrowth structure is shown in Figure 3.1c together with the parent



                       400



                       300
                      Intensity [Counts]  200






                       100

                              EMD, Chemetals
                         0

                         10   15  20   25   30  35   40  45   50   55  60   65   70
                                                    2θ [°]

                    Figure 3.2  XRD pattern of an EMD sample (Chemetals).
                    The diffractogram is taken with a Bruker AXS D5005 diffrac-
                    tometer using CuKα radiation and a scintillation counter.
                                    ◦
                    The step width is 0.02 with a constant counting time of
                    10 s/step.
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131