Page 135 - Handbook of Biomechatronics
P. 135

132                                                     Domen Novak


          1.1.1 EEG Paradigms
          Before focusing on the technical aspects of EEG measurements, let us first
          look at the waveforms of interest in the EEG signal as well as ways of eliciting
          them. The most important waveforms for biomechatronics are steady-state
          visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs), the P300, and motor/mental imagery,
          all of which are used to actively send commands through a BCI (Novak and
          Riener, 2015). However, BCIs can also measure a user’s mental workload or
          error-related brain potentials without the user’s active participation or even
          awareness, as we shall see in the following sections.


          Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials
          SSVEPs are the brain’s natural responses to visual stimulation at different
          frequencies (Nicolas-Alonso and Gomez-Gil, 2012). In brief, if a person
          looks at a light that is flashing with a particular frequency, their visual cor-
          tex responds with EEG activity at the same frequency. This principle is
          used in BCIs as a gaze-tracking method: multiple symbols are shown to
          the user on a screen, with each symbol flashing at a different frequency.
          By measuring the SSVEP frequency using electrodes close to the visual
          cortex, the machine can identify which symbol the user is looking at.
          Depending on the number and complexity of possible commands, this
          can be done either in a single stage (the final command is directly selected
          from all possible ones) or in multiple stages (a subset of commands is first
          selected from all possible ones, and the final specific command is then
          selected from the subset).
             SSVEPs are commonly used in biomechatronics to send commands to a
          device. The user is presented with multiple commands on a screen (e.g.,
          move robot forward, stop) and selects one by looking at it. The user can also
          choose not to send a command by simply not focusing on the screen. The
          approach is noninvasive and easy to use with little or no training, and the
          number of possible commands can be quite high—the main limitations are
          keeping the symbols on the screen far enough apart so that the user is not
          looking at two flashing lights at once as well as keeping the different symbols
          flashing at sufficiently different frequencies that they can be separated in the
          EEG. The main disadvantage of the SSVEP approach is that a screen must be
          added to the device, which may not be optimal for all situations (e.g., por-
          table devices). Furthermore, it is prone to false positives since users still see
          the screen at the edge of their vision even if they do not wish to control the
          device (Ortner et al., 2011).
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140