Page 137 - Handbook of Biomechatronics
P. 137

134                                                     Domen Novak


          generated a P300), the procedure can be repeated until the system is suffi-
          ciently certain of the correct command.
             The P300 requires no training to utilize, but has a lower information
          transfer rate than SSVEPs in state-of-the-art BCIs,  20–25bits/min com-
          pared to 60–100bits/min with SSVEPs (Nicolas-Alonso and Gomez-Gil,
          2012). Again, false positives are problematic, as P300 responses also occur
          naturally in the absence of visual stimuli. Furthermore, the P300 suffers from
          the same disadvantage as the SSVEP: a screen must be used to present the
          stimuli.


          Motor Imagery
          Unlike SSVEPs and the P300, motor imagery has the advantage that no
          devices or other external stimuli are required for it. Its principle is simple:
          the user thinks of making a motion, and the activity of the motor cortex
          changes as a result of the imagined motion even if no movement is actually
          performed. This activity can be measured and used to control
          biomechatronic devices. For example, imagined left-arm movement could
          be used to move the left arm of a full-body exoskeleton. However, effective
          use of motor imagery requires special user training, and only a small number
          of motor images can be distinguished using EEG (Nicolas-Alonso and
          Gomez-Gil, 2012). For example, the user may be able to select whether
          to move the left or right arm of an exoskeleton, but would not be able to
          choose the specific movement that should be performed with that arm.


          Mental Imagery
          Mental imagery is similar to motor imagery, but instead of imagining
          motions, the user performs different types of cognitive activities: mental sub-
          traction, auditory imagery, spatial navigation, etc. (Friedrich et al., 2012)As
          the frequency distribution of the EEG changes depending on the user’s
          mental workload (Herrmann et al., 2004; Antonenko et al., 2010), BCIs
          can use this information to determine whether or not the user is performing
          a certain cognitive activity. Furthermore, since different cognitive activities
          are connected with different regions of the brain (e.g., frontal regions for
          mental subtraction), it is possible to differentiate between them using
          EEG recorded from different regions. By programming the BCI to perform
          specific commands in response to specific mental imagery (e.g., start moving
          a wheelchair if mental subtraction is detected), we can thus allow users to
          control biomechatronic devices through different cognitive activities.
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142