Page 336 - Handbook of Biomechatronics
P. 336

Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Robots: A Survey              329


              done on a smooth trajectory (Krebs et al., 2003; Johnson et al., 2006; Brewer
              et al., 2006; Amirabdollahian et al., 2007; Wolbrecht et al., 2007; Rosati
              et al., 2007; Loureiro and Harwin, 2007; Montagner et al., 2007; Erol
              and Sarkar, 2007) that is determined by the “minimum-jerk” hypothesis
              (Flash and Hogan, 1985). The reference trajectory can be obtained from
              unimpaired volunteers in the so-called “record-and-replay” method
              (Kousidou et al., 2007; Staubli et al., 2009), or it can be generated by the
              therapist guidance, which is called “teach-and-replay” (Pignolo et al.,
              2012). If the desired trajectory is a path followed by the unimpaired limb,
              it is called passive mirroring, which is based on bilateral training (Pignolo
              et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2013). Finally, in the passive stretching, the limbs
              are coordinated by measuring the angle-resistance torque relation (Ren
              et al., 2013).
                 In triggered passive control, the device uses biosignals as control inputs,
              but this triggering may cause slacking in which the patient does not show any
              effort and waits for the robot assistance. These controllers are gaze-based
              tracking (Loconsole et al., 2011; Novak and Riener, 2013), EMG-based
              (Crow et al., 1989; Dipietro et al., 2005; Stein et al., 2007; Choi and
              Kim, 2007; Duc et al., 2008; Cesqui et al., 2013; Loconsole et al., 2014;
              Rahman et al., 2015; Leonardis et al., 2015; Elbagoury and Vladareanu,
              2016), FES-based (Hu and Tong, 2014; Kapadia et al., 2014), and brain-
              computer interface (BCI)-based (which also includes EEG-based control-
              lers) (Fok et al., 2011; Frisoli et al., 2012; Sakurada et al., 2013;
              Venkatakrishnan et al., 2014; Dremstrup et al., 2014; Brauchle et al.,
              2015; Barsotti et al., 2015).
                 Partially assistive control is implemented by various methods (see Fig. 2).
              In impedance-based assistance, different variations of impedance and admit-
              tance controls are used to control the rehabilitation robot (Reinkensmeyer
              et al., 2000; Colombo et al., 2005; Kahn et al., 2006; Gupta and O’Malley,
              2006; Carignan et al., 2009; Culmer et al., 2010; Tsai et al., 2010; Miller and
              Rosen, 2010; Yu et al., 2011).In attractive force field control, some types of
              manipulability ellipsoid are used to apply force in specific directions (Kim
              et al., 2013; Yamashita, 2014). If a musculoskeletal upper extremity model
              is used to implement a model-based assistive control in an exoskeleton, it is a
              model-based assistance (Ding et al., 2008, 2010). If the adaption to the perfor-
              mance index is done from trial to trial, it is called learning-based control. Offline
              adaptive (Balasubramanian et al., 2008; Wolbrecht et al., 2008; P erez-
              Rodrı ´guez et al., 2014; Proietti et al., 2015) and artificial intelligence (AI)
              (Herna ´ndez Arieta et al., 2007) controls are among this type of control
   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341