Page 183 - Handbooks of Applied Linguistics Communication Competence Language and Communication Problems Practical Solutions
P. 183

Humour across cultures: joking in the multicultural workplace  161


                             We turn now to our second case study, a multicultural factory team with very
                          distinctive communication patterns, including distinctive ways of using humour
                          between team members.


                          4.2.   Case study 2: A multinational factory
                          Our second community of practice comprises a close-knit team of mainly male
                          shift workers in a Wellington factory. The team includes members from four dif-
                          ferent ethnic groups, namely Samoan, Ma ¯ori, Tongan and Pa ¯keha ¯. Most of their
                          communication is in English, although Samoan is also used on occasion, es-
                          pecially between Samoan workers. As described in Holmes and Stubbe:

                             “the team enjoys sustained and multiplex mutual relationships”. They have daily
                             briefing sessions, individuals have regular contact with one another in the course of
                             their 12-hour shifts, they see one another at ‘smoko’ (tea/coffee breaks), and there is
                             regular social contact between many team members outside work hours. Moreover,
                             because many of the team members have worked together for a relatively long time,
                             and have developed a strong sense of group identity, they are a very cohesive group.
                             There is a real sense of joint enterprise in this team, which is highly-motivated both
                             in terms of completing the immediate tasks during a shift, as well as meeting longer
                             term goals such as continuing to out-perform other production teams, and meeting
                             quality and safety targets. Teamwork is highly and explicitly valued, something
                             which is further reinforced by the Polynesian cultural background of a majority of
                             the team, which tends to privilege the group over individuals.
                                                                      Holmes and Stubbe 2003b: 589

                          One of the more noticeable ways in which these characteristics are reflected in
                          discourse is in a strong orientation to team morale, and a very distinctive
                          sparky communicative style. Team members use many markers of solidarity in
                          their interactions, and there is a good deal of in-group talk and gossip. They
                          also have a well-deserved reputation at the factory for uninhibited swearing,
                          and constantly joking around and ‘having each other on’ which sits alongside
                          their status as the top-performing team. At the time of the study, their particular
                          blend of verbal humour, jocular abuse and practical jokes contributed to a
                          unique team culture, and generally helped to create positive relationships
                          within the team”. 4
                             This multicultural team has thus developed a distinctive approach to work-
                          place interaction and humour is an integral component of this style. Expletives
                          and jocular abuse, in particular, distinguished this team as a community of prac-
                          tice from others both within the factory and outside. Team members swore at
                          each other “not only with impunity, but with positive affect. Forms of fuck [for
                          example], appear to act as markers of solidarity and positive politeness for
                          members of this community of practice” (Daly et al. 2004: 954). Moreover, jok-
                          ing around and playing practical jokes on each other were regular events con-
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188