Page 126 - Historical Dictionary of Political Communication in the United States
P. 126

PROPAGANDA
                                                                         115
           PRIMING is a specific  kind  of agenda  setting that has implications for political
           campaigns.  The  media  in  their  coverage  create  an  agenda  for  a  political  cam-
          paign,  and  that  agenda,  rather  than  the  candidate's  own  agenda  or  campaign
          platform,  may  be  the  basis  on  which  the  voter  evaluates  the  candidate.
             One  study  found  that during  the Persian  Gulf  crisis, President George Bush's
           overall rating depended  more on opinions  of his foreign  policy than on opinions
           about his economic policy. Before  the Gulf crisis, economic policy carried more
           weight,  as  it  apparently  did  after  the crisis.
           SOURCES: Shanto Iyengar  and Adam Simon,  "News  Coverage  of the Gulf Crisis and
           Public  Opinion:  A  Study  of  Agenda  Setting,  Priming  and  Framing,"  Communication
          Research,  June  1993; Wemer  J.  Severin  and  James  W.  Tankard,  Jr.,  Communication
           Theories,  fourth  edition,  1997.
                                                          Guido H.  Stempel HI

          PROGRESSIVE    CASE.  This  rare  court  order  of  "prior  restraint"  preventing
          publication  of information  in  1979 never made it to the U.S. Supreme Court  for
           a ruling  under the First Amendment.  The Justice Department,  claiming national
           security  was  at risk,  obtained  an injunction  in federal  district court  against Pro-
          gressive  magazine,  which  planned  to  publish  information  on  how  to  build  a
           hydrogen  bomb. The  Progressive,  a  left-wing  magazine  published  in  Madison,
          Wisconsin,  since  1909,  said  the  "secret"  information  about  the  H-bomb  had
          been  obtained  from  unclassified  sources  and  was  thus  available  to anyone. The
           magazine  sought  to  publish  the  article  to  demonstrate  how  badly  the  classifi-
           cation  system  was  working.  The  government,  however,  cited  provisions  of  the
           1954 Atomic Energy Act as justifying  prior restraint. Federal judge Robert War-
          ren  granted  the  injunction,  ruling  the  act  allowed  prior  restraint.  He  did  not
           consider  the Pentagon  Papers  case,  in  which  the U.S. Supreme  Court had  ruled
          against prior restraint,  to be a clear precedent.  Before  an appeal could be heard,
          however,  articles  containing  the  same  information  were  published  in two  other
          periodicals.  The  government  dropped  the  case  against  the  Progressive  imme-
          diately,  and  the  magazine  published  the  article  six  months  after  the  original
          planned  date. The extent to which  national  security concerns might override the
          Pentagon  Papers  decision  against  prior  restraint  thus  was  never  clarified  by  the
          U.S.  Supreme  Court.

          SOURCES: Ellen Alderman  and Caroline Kennedy, In Our Defense:  The Bill of Rights
          in Action, 1991;  Wayne Overbeck, Major Principles of Media Law, 1997-1998.
                                                                  Marc  Edge

          PROPAGANDA     is written, oral, or visual communication  used to influence  the
          attitudes,  beliefs,  and  actions  of  an  audience.  Many  political  groups  and  gov-
          ernments  use  propaganda  to  further  their  causes  and  interests  to  sway  public
          opinion.  Communication  that  is  considered  propaganda  is  biased,  intentional,
          and  motivated  by personal  gain  on  the part  of  the person  or group  that  initiates
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131