Page 240 - Hydrogeology Principles and Practice
P. 240

HYDC06  12/5/05  5:33 PM  Page 223






                                                         Groundwater quality and contaminant hydrogeology  223




























                   Fig. 6.15 Effect of density on the transport of dissolved contaminants in a uniform groundwater flow field. In (a) the contaminant density
                   (ρ ) is slightly greater than the density of the groundwater (ρ ). In (b) the contaminant density is greater than the groundwater density.
                    c                                   w


                   6.3.4 Effects of density and heterogeneity    In fractured material, aquifer properties are spa-
                                                               tially variable and are often controlled by the orienta-
                   The processes of advection, dispersion and retardation  tion and frequency of fractures. As shown in Fig. 6.17,
                   all influence the pattern of contaminant distribution  when contamination occurs in fractures, there is a
                   away from a pollution source. Other considerations  gradient of contaminant concentration between the
                   include the effects of contaminant density and, more-  mobile groundwater in the fracture and the static
                   over, the influence of aquifer heterogeneity, both of  water in the adjacent rock matrix. Under this condi-
                   which make the overall monitoring and prediction   tion, part of the contaminant mass will migrate by
                   of the extent of groundwater pollution very difficult.   molecular diffusion from the fracture into the pore-
                   A density contrast between the contaminant and  water contained in the rock matrix, so effectively
                   groundwater will affect the migration of a pollution  removing it from the flowing groundwater. Such
                   plume, with a contaminant denser than water tend-  dual-porosity aquifers are notoriously difficult to
                   ing to sink steeply downwards into the groundwater  remediate since the contaminant stored in the matrix
                   flow field as shown in Fig. 6.15.             can gradually diffuse back into the moving ground-
                     The description of contaminant transport given in  water in the fracture, long after the source of contam-
                   Section 6.3.1 assumes a homogeneous porous mater-  ination has been removed.
                   ial with steady, uniform groundwater flow. This is
                   a simplification of real situations in nature where
                   heterogeneities within the aquifer lithology create a  6.4 Sources of groundwater contamination
                   pattern of solute movement considerably different to
                   that predicted by the theory for homogeneous mater-  The sources of groundwater contamination are, as
                   ial. If a pollution source contains multiple solutes and  shown in Table 6.1, as varied as the range of polluting
                   occurs within a heterogeneous aquifer containing beds,  activities. The purpose of this section is to introduce
                   lenses and fractures of differing hydraulic conductiv-  the principal sources and classes of groundwater con-
                   ity, then there will be a number of contaminant fronts  taminants with respect to urban and industrial con-
                   and pathways such that the morphology of the result-  taminants, municipal and septic wastes, agricultural
                   ing plume will be very complex indeed (Fig. 6.16).  contaminants, and saline intrusion in coastal aquifers.
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245