Page 169 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 169

Machinery Reliability Audits and Reviews   141


                   ence of  any manufacturer under close consideration. Examination of  a manufactur-
                   er’s experience should serve to identify design extrapolations, or scale-ups. In exam-
                   ining  manufacturers’  experience, the purchaser’s  engineer cannot, in many  cases,
                   look at data such as maximum horsepower compressor built to date. The following
                   example will illustrate this point.
                     Let us assume  a machine has been furnished with  10 equally loaded  cylinders
                   absorbing a total of  14,000 HP. The manufacturer may proudly point to his  14,000
                   HP experience when bidding,  say, an %cylinder machine absorbing “only”  13,000
                   PIP. He is not likely to emphasize that his 13,000 HP machine may subject many of
                   the Compressor components to forces that are approximately  16% higher than those
                   seen by his well-proven 14,000 HP machine.
                     The value of  component strength comparisons between competing offers is also
                   evident from a review of  manufacturers’  frame-rating  terminology.  How does one
                   compare one vendor’s  “instantaneous  overload  capacity” with  another vendor’s
                   “continuous overload capacity,” “rated capacity,” or “design capacity?’  Component
                   strength analysis is one way to obtain a grasp of design conservatism and, thus, ven-
                   der standing. This analysis should include the load-carrying capability of the various
                   compressor bearings, cylinder design factors of safety, and combined gas and inertia
                   loading of compressor components.
                     Reciprocating-compressor  component strength analysis requires summing up the
                   gas and inertia forces acting on opposing pistons or plungers. Figures 3-37 and 3-38
                   are graphical representations of the resultant forces on first- and second-stage crank
                   bearings of  a large hyper compressor used for ethylene compression. Instantaneous
                   gas pressures acting in hyper-compressor cylinders can be  calculated with  the
                   method shown later. The same section shows a typical sample calculation for inertia
                   forces acting at a particular crank angle. These calculations lead to  a tabulation  of


                                              CYl. A
                                     A        Gas Load “A





                                                                 lnerlia Forces “)1.


                                                                        360’




                                      I


                          Figure 3-37. Forces acting on first stage of typical hyper compressor.
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174