Page 178 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 178

Machinery Reliability Audits and Reviews   149

                   stantially greater than claimed by the pump vendor. This is in part due to the fact that
                   Hydraulic  Institute  Standards permit  pump manufactures  to plot  as NPSH,  values
                   those test points where a 3% drop in discharge pressure was noted.35 Unfortunately,
                   cavitation may already be quite severe at these points. It has also been suspected that
                   vendors have occasionally extrapolated a few test points into a smooth curve that did
                   not represent the real situation.
                     Then again, user demand for high efficiency, lower cost, and low NrPSHR pumps
                   drove suction-specific speeds into the range above  12,000, where certain deviations
                   from BEP flow could  cause internal recirculation  phenomena  which  render pump
                   operation hydraulically unstable. Turbulent flow causes impeller erosion and signifi-
                   cant fluctuations in mechanical seal action, bearing loading, and shaft deflection. It
                   is worthwhile to note that for many pumps the manufacturer’s published minimum
                   acceptable  flow  values  were based  on  flow  necessary  to prevent  excessive  heat
                   buildup.  These values  may  not even approach  the minimum  permissible flow  for
                   erosion avoidance in high Nsss  pumps; they have been found off by  very substantial
                   margins on numerous occasions.
                     In  view of  this  experience, process  plants  occasionally  have used  procurement
                   guidelines and “rule-of-thumb” conservatism aimed at achieving higher pump relia-
                   bility. Table 3- 12 represents one of these experience-based guidelines.
                     Since about  1980, pump manufacturers have occasionally published data that can
                   be used  to better establish the allowable minimum flow  for pumps with  given
                   designs and operating characteristics, While earlier representations illustrated typical
                   observations but tended to avoid giving numerical values, Figure 3-42 can be used to
                   avoid the selection of pumps which would give poor service at operation away from
                   BEP. The top part of Figure 3-42 should be used with pumps whose specific speed
                   (Ms)*  ranges ffrom 500-2,500. The lower part of Figure 3-42 applies to pumps with
                   Ns-values from 2,500 to 10,000.
                     The following example illustrates how to use the screening values shown in Figure
                   3-42. Assume we have a 3,560 hp pump with a BEP capacity of 2,600 gpm. A dou-

                                               Table 3-12
                               Minimum Acceptable Flow for Centrifugal Pumps
                           Suction Specific Speed,         Minimum Flow as a
                                   Nsss                  Percentage of BEP Flow

                                <9,000                           45%
                                 9,000-9,999                     50%
                                10,000-1 0,999                   60%
                                1 1,000-1 1,999                  70%
                                12,000-12,999                    75%
                                1 3,000- 1 3,999                 80%
                                14,000-15,999                    85%
                                16,000 and up                    90%


                   *Ns = N (Q)0.5/(H)075 where N = pump speed, rpm;
                     Q = BEP capacity in gpm; H =head in ft, at BEP capacity of largest diameter impeller
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183