Page 24 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 24

Information Exchange. This is a vital issue. There are three basic
                  alternatives  for information  exchange.  Many  large corporations  imple-
                  ment  single-supplier,  facility-wide  information  systems  that  include
                  accounting,  financial,  personnel,  operations,  and maintenance.  Others
                  accomplish a custom integration to connect information components and
                  practices currently in  use  within  the enterprise. A  third  alternative
                  employs self-integrating open systems that enable an enterprise to pick
                  components that are best for their specific application with assurance of
                  interoperabili ty.
                    The single-supplier structure has the advantage of defined accountabil-
                  ity. Disadvantages include total reliance on a single supplier and the dif-
                  ficulty of duplicating and maintaining  levels of excellence equivalent to
                  specialized, applications-specific information components within a single
                  source system. The crucial question is whether  an information system
                  designed primarily for one purpose can be efficiently extended to accorn-
                  modate the facilities and rich detail necessary to gain maximum value in
                  specialized areas such as condition assessment, lifetime prediction,  an
                  condition-directed  maintenance. And  if  not, how  are these vital  tasks
                  incorporated into the overall architecture?
                    Integrating information components that are in  use  within  an  enter-
                  prise has the advantages of familiarity and presumably adequate perfor-
                  mance for the tasks. Disadvantages include the hazards of  institutional-
                  izing current practice, which may not be best practice, and the high-cost,
                  one-time, specialized nature of component integration. The necessity to
                  redo all or part of  a system integration in order to gain the benefits of
                  advances in experience and technology is another potentially costly dis-
                  advantage.
                    3elf integration, the so called “plug-and-play” open system has numer-
                  ous advantages for enterprise information systems. Users can select com-
                  ponents that are best for their specific application with assurance of full
                  information exchange. System components and information can migrate
                  to best-practice improvements at least cost as experience and technology
                  increase. The personal  computer  model is instructive. Low-cost  word
                  processing, ready exchange of information between applications, and the
                  current proliferation  of  CD-ROMs for multiple uses  would  not  have
                  occurred  without  a  standard platform  and open information exchange
                  conventions.





                                                 xxi
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29