Page 307 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 307

278   Improving Machinery Reliability

                                                 Table 5-9
                                Straight Line and Double Declining Depreciation






                    When profit before tax is positive, the company pays taxes. For a project or process,
                    tax numbers are used to calculate cash flows. After the tax is included, the cash flow
                    is discounted to get present value, and the sum of all present values gives the NPV.
                      When the net present values are known for the project life, then the discounted
                    cash flow (DCF) rate can be calculated  to arrive at a profitability  index. The dis-
                    counted cash flow rate is the return that forces the NPV to zero. It’s the maximum
                    cost of  capital that can be paid just to break even  on the project. The DCF index
                    defines an economical quality value for the project and is useful for comparing pro-
                    jects of different sizes. Large DCFs are desirable but small investments and big sav-
                    ings result  in numbers  that  are often  questioned.  The DCF index sometimes has
                    problems  in  ranking  project  desirability  so base final decisions  on the NPV.  Of
                    course, this assumes a common time period for the life of the items.
                      If  equipment life among alternatives  is not the same, then  a more complicated
                     analysis  is required  to divide the NPV  by  an annuity  factor.  The annuity  factor
                    depends on equipment lifetime,  discount rates, and equivalent annual cash flow to
                     correct for unequal  equipment  life. This calculation  puts NPV  alternatives on  an
                     equivalent annual basis using an annuity factor (AF) where AF = [((l + i)N - l)h*
                     (1 + i)N] and i  = discount rate,  N  = equipment life.  The annual  equivalent NPV,
                     (AENPV) is found by AENPV = NPV/AF. For example, if two competing projects
                     each project a NPV = $150,000 using a DCF = 12%, and case 1 has equipment life
                     of five years while case 2 has a life of ten years, by common sense, case 1 is prefer-
                                                        = 3.605 and AFN=  = 5.650 so that
                     able. But here is how  it works  out: AFN=~
                     AENPVN  =  = $41,611  and AENPVN = 10  = $26,547. This shows the five-year life
                     case is 1.6 fold more attractive.
                       Engineers must be concerned with life cycle costs for making important economic
                     decisions through  engineering  actions.  Management  deplores  engineers  who  are
                     engineering smart but economics stupid. Engineers must get the equation balanced to
                     create wealth  for shareholders. Often this  means:  stop doing some things  the old
                     way, and start doing new things in smarter ways.
                       Example  1 shown below  illustrates the above ideas and concepts  for a financial
                     analysis. This example is not a LCC model but it is typical of how equipment is jus-
                     tified:
                       Example: Two alternatives  are being  considered  for installing  an on-line spare
                     pump in  parallel  with  an existing ANSI grade pump to avoid  outages  that  have
                     plagued  a chemical  plant.  The parallel  pump (which will be  operated  every other
                     week on a rotation schedule and whenever pump failure occurs-this  is an incremen-
   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312