Page 43 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 43

Requirements Specification   15


                              INarrative Specifications Lead to Better Machinery
                     By far the most effective method of  specifying equipment is the single narrative
                   document. Instead of using  a series of  disjointed  individual  specifications and sta-
                   pling them into a stack of  reference leaflet, the narrative document serves to blend
                   all applicable references into a unified whole. In developing this single narrative, the
                   responsible project  engineer  will use  thought processes  that tend  to uncover over-
                   sights, weaknesses, and  deficiencies in  the  procurement and  design efforts for
                   machinery installed in process plants.
                     Again,  the  single narrative  pulls together  only  the truly  relevant  information,
                   whereas the  cross-referenced  individual  plant  specification  approach  tends  to be
                   extremely bulky, leaving it to the vendor to find relevant specification clauses, and
                   depriving the purchaser’s project engineer  from detecting oversights  or other defi-
                   ciencies. Experience confirms that additional cost incurred in developing single nar-
                   rative  specifications is often  recovered  before the plant  starts  to  manufacture  on-
                   specification product at full capacity.
                     A single narrative supplement should spell out all requirements that add to, delete
                   from, or provide explanatory details to the API focal point specification. A typical
                   narrative  specification  for centrifugal  compressors  would  state that “the following
                   requirements are additions, deletions, modifications, and clarifications to API Stan-
                   dard 617, Sixth Edition, 1995.” The narrative specification would not rewrite applic-
                   able, unchanged  portions  of  API 617. Instead, it would  identify  supplementary  or
                   overriding requirements using the paragraph identification numbers used in the API
                   standard. Here is a typical example:

                     2.12 Nameplates and Rotation Arrows
                     2.12.1 A nameplate should be securely attached at an easily accessible point on
                     the equipment and on any other major piece of auxiliary equipment.
                     2.12.2 Rotation arrows shall be cast in or attached to each major item of  rotating
                     equipment. Nameplates and rotation arrows (if attached) shall be of AIS1 Standard
                     Type 300 stainless steel  or of  nickel-copper alloy  (Monel or its equivalent).
                     Attachment pins shall be of the same material.
                     2.1 2.3 The purchaser’s item number, the vendor’s name, the machine serial num-
                     ber, and the machine size and type, as well as its minimum and maximum allow-
                     able design limits and rating data (including pressures, temperatures, speeds, and
                     power), maximum allowable working pressures and temperatures, hydrostatic test
                     pressures, and critical speeds, shall appear on the machine nameplate.


                                                                    (rex, contirrired on page 20)
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48