Page 66 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 66

38    Improving Machinery Reliability

                                                  Table 1-2
                                     Cost Analysis for Compression Systems
                                           Motor-Driven           Three Gas-Engine
                                            Centrifugal    Driven Reciprocating Compressors

                     Horsepower input        9200                  7400 (2 machines running)
                     Piping system          k5760                k$ I384
                     Foundation               404                  1390
                     3-year cost of power    14904                11888
                     Barrel compressor       2464                   -
                     Reciprocating compressor   -                  4440
                     Driver and gear         I582             Included/NA
                     Switchgear               400                    -
                     Fuel-supply facilities                         400
                     Total                k520.5 14             k$19,502
                     Maintenance: See Table 1-3 or use plant data
                     New Total


                     to the plant's  technical  staff in  advance of  plant startup. Machinery data and docu-
                     mentation packages often arrive too late to contribute to a successful plant startup.
                     Machinery  then  has  to be  commissioned,  maintained,  or repaired  without  proper
                     guidance and with inadequate planning.
                       Startup planning also involves installation completeness reviews."  These reviews
                      are critically important in the chain of pre-commissioning events leading to success-
                      ful  startup. They  must be executed  by  following  a checklist-type outline which
                      allows the reviewer to ascertain that all installation-related items defined in the job
                      specification  have been  furnished  or executed.  Unless  the reviewer  is following  a
                      written  checklist,  the  installation  completeness  review  may  be hit-and-miss,  and
                      startup delays or costly failures could result.
                        Finally, there is documentation which is, indeed, needed only after the plant is on
                      stream. However, this documentation, too, should be obtained before the equipment
                      vendor is paid his final retention payment. Attempts to gather up the data sometime
                      later have often proven to be expensive, frustrating, or unsuccessful. Based on actual
                      experience,  it is concluded  that project teams should be given the responsibility of
                      obtaining these data. Representing the owner of the plant, the project team may elect
                      to have the design contractor put equipment vendors under contractual obligation to
                      provide important data on time and in usable format.

                      What Each Machinery Data File Should Contain

                        Efficient and accurate repair and troubleshooting of machinery requires good docu-
                      mentation. Also, it is important that plant maintenance and technical service person-
                      nel are given ready access to this documentation, be it in paper or electronic format.

                      *For coiiiprehensive  information on this  topic,  see Bloch and Geitner, hfrodtctiori fo Mrrchirtery
                       Relinhilify Assessnienf, 2nd ed. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71