Page 65 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 65

Requireinents Specification   37

                 ments are often achieved at the expense of mechanical reliability. Specifically, tight
                 labyrinth clearances may  indicate high test-stand efficiency, but they are also prone
                 to cause mechanical contact during operational upsets. Should this happen, the user
                 is not only losing  a fair measure of  compressor efficiency, but is also running the
                 risk of  mechanical damage.
                   Extra capacity  looks good in light of  future  uprate potential, but  it may  cost  in
                 terms of  requiring  large recycle streams to  avoid  compressor  surge  during  initial
                 operation of the compressor. Similar concerns exist for centrifugal pumps operating
                 at flows substantially below their best efficiency point (BEP). This element is further
                 explained in Chapter 2, “Selecting Major Machinery Vendors.”
                   In today’s  energy-conscious production  and procurement  environment,  strong
                 contractual safeguards are recommended. In virtually all cases, the user must be pre-
                 pared to pay the cost of certified and witnessed performance tests. If  these tests are
                 to be conducted in the field, it is important for vendor and purchaser to agree before-
                 hand  on test-equipment types, test-equipment  location,  and  applicable  test proce-
                 dures to be followed.

                 Assessing First Cost Versus Maintenance Cost

                   Typical maintenance costs for major equipment installed and operated in the con-
                 tinental United States are given in Chapter 4, “Benchmarking Maintenance and Reli-
                 ability.” We have arranged the text in this sequence because maintenance costs gen-
                 erally tend to emerge into real focus after the plant has started up. However, from the
                 point of  view of  the engineer who  specifies machinery  or selects  machinery from
                 among several competing offers, the  future cost of maintenance should be of concern
                 now. An example will illustrate why this is significant.
                   Let us assume a plant can satisfy a given compression  service by  using either a
                 single electric-motor-driven centrifugal compressor sized for 100% capacity, or three
                 gas-engine-driven  reciprocating  compressors  sized for 50% capacity.  The process
                 engineers, cost estimators,  and project engineers have developed  data showing the
                 foundation requirements, plot-plan arrangement, piping complexity, and utility costs
                 for the two different approaches. Their balance sheet reflects the principal elements
                 and is given in Table 1-2.
                   The initial judgment  might  favor integral  gas-engine  reciprocating  compressors
                 for this service. However,  the picture  may  change when  we apply current mainte-
                 nance statistics  for motor-driven  centrifugal  compressors  and integral  gas-engine-
                 driven compressors, Table  1-3, and project these costs over the next few years. The
                 importance  of  paying  attention  to future maintenance  cost is further  illustrated  in
                 Chapter 5, dealing with life-cycle costs studies.


                           Specifying Machinery Documentation Requirements

                   Safe operation, proper surveillance, and cost-optimized maintenance of machinery
                 requires that a good deal of machinery-related data be available and made accessible
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70