Page 106 - The Power to Change Anything
P. 106

Make the Undesirable Desirable 95


               Engage in Moral Thinking

               Most of us aren’t Perelman or anything like him. In addition to
               the fact that we’re not math savants, we also don’t pursue a pas-
               sion the way he does. Many of us spend much of our days going
               through the motions without associating what we’re doing with
               a sense of greater purpose. Consequently, these intrinsic sources
               of motivation are almost never brought into play. Why is this?
                   Often humans react to their immediate environments as if
               they were on autopilot. They don’t pause to consider how their
               immediate choices reflect their ideals, values, or moral codes.
               The connections between their actions and personal standards
               are rarely “top of mind.” Michael Davis calls this failure to con-
               nect values to action, “microscopic vision.” Ellen Langer calls
               it “mindlessness.” Patricia Werhane prefers to refer to it as a lack
               of “moral imagination.”
                   No matter their terms, each of the scholars was referring to
               the human tendency to burrow into mundane details while fail-
               ing to consider how they connect to our values, morals, and
               personal standards. This means that when we make horrific and
               costly mistakes, more often than not we’re not purposely choos-
               ing to do bad things. It’s almost as if we’re not choosing at all.
               It’s the lack of thought, not the presence of thought, that enables
               our bad behavior.
                   As disconnected and unreflective as we may be during our
               daily activities, it only gets worse when we feel threatened or
               challenged. Under stress, when our emotions kick in, our time
               horizons become even shorter, and we give less weight to our
               abstract values. For instance, Robert Lund, vice president of
               engineering at Morton Thiokol, sat in a meeting in January of
               1986 where a group of very smart people deliberated about
               whether or not to allow the space shuttle Challenger to launch.
                   Lund is a good guy. He’s a family man. He’s a good neigh-
               bor. He’s an upstanding citizen. He rose to his rank as a senior
               engineer at Thiokol because of his professionalism, dedication,
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111