Page 99 - The Power to Change Anything
P. 99

88 INFLUENCER


                 Brian Wansink, a consumer behavior psychologist, shows
             how classical conditioning influences something as basic as
             food preferences. He surveyed World War II veterans who had
             served in the South Pacific. He discovered that about a third
             of them loved Chinese food, while another third hated it. What
             made the difference? They had all eaten Chinese food during
             the war—it was all they had to eat. The third who had experi-
             enced heavy combat during the periods where they ate
             Chinese food hated it. The third who had been away from the
             front lines loved it. The soldiers had been classically condi-
             tioned to love or hate Chinese food, and these preferences
             remained 50 years later. In short, the preference was both
             learned and durable.
                 While Pavlov’s experiments linked bells to something pos-
             itive (food), other researchers used cues to signal something less
             desirable—say an electric shock. To no one’s surprise, it turns
             out that fear and pain create even more dramatic changes in
             preferences. Remember the book A Clockwork Orange? Alex,
             a particularly nasty hoodlum, is given “aversive therapy.” Prison
             doctors play images of violence choreographed to Beethoven’s
             Ninth Symphony while giving Alex drugs that make him
             severely nauseous. The aversive therapy worked so well that
             Alex could no longer defend himself—or enjoy Beethoven.
                 But, alas, this is all more of a curiosity than a helpful tool.
             Although negative associations can indeed cause profound
             change in preferences, you won’t find effective influencers using
             aversive or other aggressively manipulative methods. Shock col-
             lars all around, right? Wrong. They avoid painful techniques
             because they are ethical, principled, and nice people.
                 So, if we shouldn’t poke people with sharp sticks as a way
             of propelling them away from their inappropriate behavior,
             what’s left? Actually, there are two very powerful and ethical
             ways of helping humans change their reaction to a previously
             neutral or noxious behavior: creating  new experiences  and
             creating new motives.
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104