Page 156 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 156

P1: GYG/IJD/IBA/IJD
                            CY101-Bimber
                                          August 14, 2002
              0 521 80067 6
   CY101-04
                                 Environmental Advocacy  18:0
              organization, and had little skill or expertise in mobilizing citizens – so
              much so that one scholar observed in a study published in 1999 that since
              its beginning when “EDF had no real social network through which to
              build constituency support,” the organization has viewed its supporters
              as donors rather than true members. 71
                In 1999, officials at EDF undertook a major change in strategy in an
              effort to exploit new possibilities for communication and information
              management made possible by the Internet. EDF leadership decided to
                                                                72
              “reorient all strategies to include an Internet component.” It dropped
              the word“Fund” fromitsname,andadoptedanewlogo,withalowercase
              “e,” which evokes the electronic “e” in e-mail and e-commerce, as well
              as the environment. On its web site, the executive director of the new
              ED proclaimed, “[W]e want to use the power of the Internet to take
              environmental activism to the next level.” 73  ED would continue as a
              “scienceandthelaw”group,butwouldnowbecomeagrassrootslobbying
              firm using twenty to twenty-five full- and part-time staff.
                The functional centerpiece of the new ED was data base–driven web
              sites aimed at attracting citizens, collecting information about their en-
              vironmental interests, and then mobilizing them through calls for polit-
              ical action. The concept behind the change was a traditional one, even
              though the consequences would be dramatic and new. ED officials be-
              lievedthatawealthofinformationexistedaboutneighborhoodpollution
              that could be of political value, if only it could be delivered to the right
              citizens. They understood collective action in Tocquevillian terms. Citi-
              zens have interests in the environment, they knew, but these tended to be
              highly particularistic. The key to mobilizing these citizens was deliver-
              ing highly specific information to them about their particular concerns –
              not broad, information-poor calls to collective action in order “to protect
              the environment,” but narrow, information-rich messages linking local
              events and issues with citizens’ individual interests. The Internet, ED
              felt, seemed to promise new opportunities for that kind of information-
              intensive politics.
                The change in strategy came at a time of challenge to ED and many
              other environmental organizations. The stagnation in environmental
              membership of the mid- to late 1990s had hit ED comparatively hard.
              After a period of expansion when membership had grown from about

              71  Shaiko, Voices and Echoes for the Environment,p.81.
              72
                Anonymous official, Environmental Defense, telephone interview by Joe Gardner for
                the author, April 18, 2000.
              73
                “Environmental Defense, Director’s Message,” May 2000, http://www.ed.org.
                                            139
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161