Page 159 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 159

P1: GYG/IJD/IBA/IJD
                                                       18:0
                                        August 14, 2002
                          CY101-Bimber
  CY101-04
            0 521 80067 6
                                  Political Organizations
              to solicit these affiliates heavily, even though their attachments to the
              group are very weak. Referring to the organization’s initial communica-
              tion strategy using new information technology, one Defenders official
              says, “[W]e made a decision at the beginning not just to go after our
              membership.” 81
                 By 2001, ED had developed strategies aimed exclusively at recruiting
              the kind of lite-greens that it had discovered were visiting its original
              web site. The group hired advertising firms to develop and place online
              banner ads aimed at citizens sympathetic to an environmental issue but
              not otherwise self-identified as environmentalists. It also developed a
              dedicated lite-green web site in cooperation with the National Wildlife
              Fund, and directed citizens responding to its banner advertisements to
              the site. 82  ED now had multiple faces. To the dedicated traditional en-
              vironmentalist, it was a committed, liberal defender of the environment
              working on a range of issues to improve the condition of the air, land,
              and water. To lite-green citizens, it was a friendly, nonstrident group who
              cared about whatever particular issue they cared about.
                 The economics of this redefined membership have yet to fully de-
              velop, but ED and Defenders of Wildlife approached affiliates in the
              following way. Compared with a traditional member, an affiliate offers
              less sustained value to the organization. An affiliate provides no mate-
              rial resources to the organization, and may respond only once or twice
              to appeals for action. In this sense, their political attachments are thin.
              On the other hand, affiliates are inexpensive to identify and contact, and
              represent a potentially very large pool of recruits. An official at Defenders
              reports that his group is not concerned that citizens may have provided
              the group with their electronic mail address only because they saw a pic-
              ture of a cute animal at a commercial web site. His group is satisfied if
              a lite-green affiliate participates in only a single mobilization effort and
              then disappears. The group drops from its list any affiliate who has not
              responded to at least three calls for action in twelve months, so the list is
              constantly churning. The organization’s approach is quite the opposite
              of attempting to extract extra yearly commitments from its dues-paying
              membersonanannualbasis.EDstillmakeslittleefforttomobilizeitstra-
              ditionaldues-payingmembersintograssrootsaction;itreservesthatclass
              of politics for its affiliates. One organization official says, “The Internet


              81
                Anonymous official, Defenders of Wildlife, telephone interview by Joe Gardner for
                the author, Feb. 28, 2000.
              82
                The site is http://www.formyworld.com.
                                            142
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164