Page 277 - Inorganic Mass Spectrometry - Fundamentals and Applications
P. 277

Sample  Types
          Analysis of  ~oncon~uctive                                    263

          scribes the analysis of insulating  materials by GD-MS, a review by Winchester et
          al.  provides  additional  background for such  analyses for the complete  family of
          GD spectroscopies  [36].  It is hoped  that  the  reader  will see that  there  are  indeed  a
          number of options  available for meeting  the  challenges  presented by this  ever-in-
          creasing  and  important set of sample  types.







          The use of the sample  compaction  methodology is an  effective  means ofanalyz-
          ing  powder-form  samples  such  as geological  materials  and  spent  automotive  cat-
          alysts. The mixing of  powders  with  conductive  host  metals  involves  four basic
          steps: (1) drying of the sample  to  drive off residual water, (2) weighing  appropri-
          ate amounts of  sample  and  binder,  (3)  mixing  mechanically  to  homogenize  the
          components,  and  (4)  pressing the sample into the appropriate size and  shape  as dic-
                                                      a
          tated by the sample  holder.  Each of these  steps  involves finite  period  and  requires
          judicious optimization  and  protocol  development.  The  use of  the sample  com-
          paction  methodology  was  introduced  early  ('1972)  in  the  evolution of  glow  dis-
                                                et
          charge  atomic  emission  spectrometry  by  Dogan al. [ 181. Marcus  and  coworkers
          reviewed a great  deal of the  developmental  aspects of the compaction  methodol-
          ogy as it applies  to GD-AES [36].  Loving  and  Harrison E371 published  the  first  de-
          scription of the  use of the compaction  procedure for mass  spectrometry  in  1983  as
          part of a study  evaluating  the  role of water  vapor  on  GD-MS  performance  with a
                                                                    for
          dual-pin  cathode  geometry.  Borrowing  from  the  methodology  developed spark
                                                    of 90% graphite  and 10% ar-
          source  mass  spectrometry,  pin  electrodes  composed
          senic  powder  were  formed  by  using a die  and  hydraulic  press. Stable [42% rela-
          tive  standard  deviation  (RSD)]  As+ signals  were  produced,  though  the  published
          spectrum  clearly  displayed  that  residual  water  and  atmospheric  species  were  major
          spectral components.  Harrison  and  coworkers  [38]  revisited  the  approach  in  an
          early  investigation of  a hollow  cathode  plume  (HGP)  ionization  source,  wherein
          an  alumina-based  automotive catalyst was  mixed  50:50 in a silver  matrix.  Neither
          of these  early  studies  delved into the  determination of  the  most  effective  imple-
          mentation of the  compaction  procedure,  though  they  demonstrated  characteristics
          that  have  launched a series of detailed  studies.




          Throughout the literature describing the compacted  sample methodology, the
                                                            to
          choice of the binder  material  has  time  and  again  been  pointed as the  most  im-
          portant  aspect  in  determining  source  performance.  Papers  by  Tong  and  Harrison
           [39],  Mei  and  Harrison  [40,41],  Smith  and  coworkers  [42,43],  and  Wayne  [44]  have
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282