Page 278 - Inorganic Mass Spectrometry - Fundamentals and Applications
P. 278

264                                                        Marcus

                                                                of
           all evaluated  the  role of metal  matrix  material  on  the  performance GD-MS  ion
           sources. The  choice of binder  material is dictated by a  combination  of the sample
           disk's  robustness,  sample  sputtering  rate  (affecting  analyte  signal  intensity),  abil-
                                                              air (i.e., gettering
           ity to remove  unwanted  residual  gases  such  as  water  vapor  and
           quality),  binder  purity,  and  possible  isobaric  interferences  with  target  analytes.
                A pair of papers from the Harrison  laboratory  form the  most  comprehensive
           body of work  dealing  with the use of the  compaction  methodologies  in  GD-MS.
           Tong  and  Harrison  evaluated  six  different  matrix  materials:  graphite,  Ag,  Al,  Cu,
           Fe, and  Ta.  Going  through the matrices,  some  generalities  about  each  matrix  can
           be provided 1391. Table 7.1 summarizes  the  metal  binder  materials  investigated for
           GD-MS  applications  and  the  mass  spectral features of the  pure  binder  materials
           (i.e.,  without  oxide  samples  added). First, graphite is available  in  high  purity  and
           fine  composition  but it sputters too slowly,  tends to produce  metal carbide (MCf)
           species,  and is susceptible  to  adsorbed  water. The latter characteristic  results  in the
           presence of a large number of  water-  and atmosphe~e-related ions  (e.g.,  H,O+, NZ+)
           in the spectrum.  Both  copper  and  silver sputter very  well  and  produce  high  ana-



               le l Major Ion Peaks  in  GDMS  Spectra  of Pure  Compacted  Discsa
                                   Faraday  detector  voltage,  1  V = lo8 ion&
           Ion  species   d  Z    C     cu      Ag  A1           Fe      Ta
            '2C            12  0.15  0.03  n.d.          m.d.    n,d.    n.d.
            l60H2          18  0.20  0.58  0.35  n.d.  n.d.  n.d.
            160H3          19  0.05  0.45  0.20  n.d.  n.d,  n.d.
            40&2+          20  0.54  0.27  0.25          0.50    0.45  0.68
            27~1           27     -      -      -         x.27   -       -
            14N2H,  12C160H  29  0.43  0.20     0.08     n.d.  n,d.      ad.
            40Ar           40  9.50  9.90  (13)  (12)  10.50  10.00
            4OArH          41  3.20  6.00  3.70  9.20  8.60  3.00
            56Fe           56            -      -        -       4.68    -
            63Cu           63     -     2.79    -        -       _.      -
            65Cu           65     -     1.38    -        -       -       -
            4oAr2          80    0.41   0.27  0.30  0.20  0.32  0.20
            l07Ag         107     -      -      7.12     -       -       -
            lo9Ag         109     -      -      6.86     -       -       __.
            l*lTa         181     -      -      -        -       -       4.22
            h€+/&            0.016  0.42  1.08  0.098  0.45  0.42
            Taken  after  obtaining  steady  state  in  discharge hr).  Bold  values  indicate  peak  intensities  of  matrix
                                          (1
            ions.
            n.d.,  nondetectable (KO.01 V).
            Source: Ref. 39.
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283