Page 100 - Inside the Film Factory New Approaches to Russian and Soviet Cinema
P. 100

5

                     Down to earth: Aelita relocated
                                       Ian Christie











                 Harmful literature is more useful than useful literature, for it is anti-
                 entropic.
                                                         Yevgeni Zamyatin 1


                                            1
                       HAS ANYONE ACTUALLY SEEN AELITA?
            Aelita undeniably has a bad reputation. As the first, and for long the only, Soviet
            ‘spectacular’, promoted  and launched like its Western equivalents,  it  naturally
            attracted suspicion in many quarters, despite (or perhaps ultimately because of) its
            resounding box-office success. Today the film itself remains as little seen as ever in
            ‘serious’ circles, and shares with the likes of High Treason and Things to Come a
            reputation of amounting to rather less than the undeniable impact of its science-
            fiction décor, stills of which,  however, enliven many  general  cinema histories. 2
            These also appear in most surveys of science-fiction film and, especially, accounts
            of Russian avantgarde art, where their futuristic geometry provides an essential
                                                                     3
            visual  and plastic emblem  of the era of heroic  Soviet  modernism.  Yet  the
            accompanying commentary often belittles, when it does not directly condemn, the
            film itself–and usually on the basis of a misleading plot summary.
              Thus a self-perpetuating tradition has developed which effectively substitutes the
            paradigmatic quality of the  stills for  the implied failure of the film. Its apparent
            subject–a Soviet  expedition to Mars  which incites  revolution against  the  ruling
            despots–simultaneously  evokes the utopian aspiration  of  much early Soviet art
            while sounding risible; and the obviously theatrical stills, although more impressive
            than those from most ‘canonic’ Soviet classics, also seem to justify the scorn which
            the film originally attracted from advocates of a revolutionary new approach to
            cinema. 4
              However, to screen Aelita is to discover something rather different from the bête
            noire of Soviet montage cinema’s pioneers. Instead of the ‘photographed muddle
            of curves and triangles’ that so infuriated Kuleshov, we find an ambitious, multi-
            layered work which draws upon pre- as well as post-Revolutionary Russian sources
            and contemporary European influences to reflect the new Soviet life more fully
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105