Page 101 - Inside the Film Factory New Approaches to Russian and Soviet Cinema
P. 101

82 DOWN TO EARTH: AELITA RELOCATED
            than  any other film of the time.  Indeed, if  we were not predisposed otherwise,
            Protazanov’s juxtaposition of different registers and realities in Aelita might remind
            us, if not of Kuleshov’s polemics, then of his own by no means straightforward
                                                        5
            realist practice, from Mr West to The Great Consoler.  But the fact that it was
            made by the ‘wrong’ director at a time when early Soviet production was being
            valued for quite different qualities, together with its ‘inner space’ project  being
            persistently misconstrued,  have all tended to  erase the film’s conjunctural
            specificity.
              To grasp this involves sketching a number of contexts in order to explore the
            crucial significance of the  film’s drastic departure from the novel  of which  it is
            actually more a critique than an adaptation. What emerges is a work defined by
            multiple authorship and a product of the emergent ‘cultural industry’ of Soviet film-
            making–two perspectives rarely brought to bear on the  cinema  of an  era so
            dominated  by the mythology  of protean artistic and ideological purpose.  A
            ‘polyphonic’  text  also, in Bakhtin’s sense,  which  allows  us to read  some of the
            many discourses that defined the contested pluralism of the New Economic Policy
            (NEP), Lenin’s contradictory legacy to the infant Soviet state. 6


                                            2
                                 ‘ANTA…ODELI…UTA…’
            Premièred at the end of September 1924, Aelita was undoubtedly the major event
            in Soviet cinema before the international breakthrough of Potemkin in in 1926.
            Like the German The Cabinet of Dr Caligari [Das Kabinett des Dr Caligari, 1919],
            which reputedly served as inspiration, it proclaimed a major industrial thrust to
            produce cinema of ‘international quality’, which could both yield export earnings
            and compete effectively with imports in the domestic  market. To  aim  at these
            ambitious goals amid the poverty and contradictory motives of Soviet production
            in  1923, its producers assembled a remarkable array  of talent and scarce
            resources. They took advantage of the imminent return from exile of a well-known
            writer, Alexei Tolstoi, to base the film on his latest  novel:  a  fantastic tale  of
            adventure and romance set  largely on Mars. Leading actors from the main
            theatres were engaged to make their film débuts, along with promising newcomers
                                        7
            and a vast army of student extras.  To direct this prestigious subject, one of the
            most celebrated directors  from pre-Revolutionary Russian cinema, Yakov
            Protazanov, also returned from exile.
              Important as  these coups  must  have been,  a  further vital ingredient was the
            stylistic novelty which had distinguished Caligari. In  place of the German film’s
            ‘Expressionism’,  Aelita deployed  the  distinctive Russian modernism which  was
            already becoming known abroad under the often inaccurately applied names of its
            various factions–Futurism, Cubo-Futurism, Suprematism and Constructivism–as
                                                                       8
            these were rapidly assimilated into the design-conscious Russian theatre.  From
            Tairov’s  Kamerny  Theatre  came the distinguished painter Alexandra Exter as
            costume  designer.  Sets were commissioned  from her  former pupil Isaak
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106