Page 128 - Inside the Film Factory New Approaches to Russian and Soviet Cinema
P. 128

THE RETURN OF THE NATIVE: YAKOV PROTAZANOV AND SOVIET CINEMA 109
            Berlin, Protazanov had  joined  the  ranks of established European directors. 25
            There can be no doubt that Protazanov, like so many of the other Russians from
            the Yermoliev and Khanzhonkov studios, could have had a successful career in
            exile in the West.  It  is not clear,  therefore,  why the maker  of  The Keys  to
            Happiness and Satan Triumphant chose to return to Soviet Russia, abandoning a
            lucrative European career. This decision would seem to give the lie to  his own
            assertion that money was one of cinema’s chief attractions for him.
              In any case,  he skilfully charted an independent course once  back,
            demonstrating yet  again his  tough-mindedness  and adaptability in the face  of
            adversity. A cursory glance at his ten Soviet silents reveals an oeuvre in keeping with
            the topical concerns of Soviet society in the 1920s (with the possible exceptions of
            The Three Millions  Trial  [Protsess  o trekh millionakh] and  Ranks and People
            [Chiny i lyudi]).
              In 1924, he made Aelita, a science-fiction fantasy about a proletarian revolution
            on Mars, very loosely based on Alexei Tolstoi’s novella; in 1925, His Call [Ego
            prizyv],  an  adventure melodrama incorporating the theme of the  ‘Leninist
            enrolment’ in the Party, and The Tailor from Torzhok [Zakroishchik iz Torzhka],
            a comedy both about the housing shortage and the state lottery. In 1926, to be sure,
            he reverted to type with The Three Millions Trial, a crime caper set in Italy that
            was one of several film adaptations of Umberto Notari’s play The Three Thieves.
            But he returned to more typically Soviet subjects in 1927 with The Man from the
            Restaurant [Chelovek iz restorana], an updating of Ivan Shmeliev’s 1911 novella
            about a downtrodden waiter who saves his daughter’s virtue; and especially with
            The Forty-First [Sorok pervyi], from Boris Lavrenev’s popular novella about the
            Red Army sharpshooter who kills her ‘White’ lover.
              In 1928,  Protazanov released  two pictures:  The White Eagle [Belyi  orel], a
            controversial adaptation of Leonid Andreyev’s story about a provincial governor
            who orders his troops to fire on civilians during the 1905 Revolution, and Don
            Diego and Pelageya [Don Diego i Pelageya], a fresh and witty comedy attacking
            the excessive bureaucratism of Soviet society. His final silent productions were
            Ranks and People [1929], drawn from three of Chekhov’s slightest short stories,
            and  The Feast of St  Jorgen [1930], an anti-religious comedy which, although
            adapted from the work of the Danish writer Harald Bergstedt, was commissioned
            as part of the campaign against religion taking place at the time. These ten films
            conformed to generally accepted standards of narrative  realism; they featured
            clearly delineated and believable heroes and villains; and for the most part, they
            were fast-paced and entertaining. Protazanov worked quickly and efficiently; unlike
            many of his younger Soviet colleagues, he knew how to finish a film on time and
                       26
            within budget.  His movies made  money and were popular with audiences, at
            least in the major cities, where movie theatres were concentrated.
              And yet Protazanov and his films were frequently subjected  to a barrage of
            criticism from reviewers and from other film-makers throughout the decade. This
            can be attributed in part to perception, to the fact that he symbolised the ‘Golden
                  27
            Series’.  In order to understand Protazanov fully, we need to examine his films
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133