Page 69 - Inside the Film Factory New Approaches to Russian and Soviet Cinema
P. 69

50 INSIDE THE FILM FACTORY
            they were already being perceived as strange anachronisms. It is symptomatic that
            as late as 1924 an orthodox figure like Alexander Voznesensky, who belonged
            entirely to the pre-Revolutionary Russian cinema, persistently recommended the
            methods  of  Dalcroze and  Delsarte  as a means of achieving  the maximum
                                            67
            ‘incarnation’ [vzhivanie] in the character,  prolonging in his own way the Gardin
            line of film theory.
              In the later Kuleshov texts (after 1929), which have until recently served as the
            basis for the evaluation of this film theory, montage and the anthropological ideas
            of the 1910s diverge, giving the impression of a strange eclecticism. The metro-
            rhythmic approach and the new anthropology differed in their methods of teaching
            the actor and of rehearsal but their direct link with the montage experiments of
            1921 was lost.
              Nevertheless the idea of the actor moving along axes, which was subsequently
            to provoke such censure, is no more than a fusion of Volkonsky’s concepts on the
            directions of the  movement of  the body and Ferdinandov’s  inclination towards
            recording the  movements of the actor. They  make complete sense  only  in  the
            context of the principle of the identity between montage and the movement of the
            body, of their mutual rhythmic resonance. The methodology of the training of the
            model actor, which was experienced in Kuleshov as a period of intensive research
            in the field of the ‘synthetic’ theory of cinema, rudimentarily preserved within itself
            the anthropological principle of montage.
              The history of Kuleshov’s theoretical research reminds us once again of the fact
            that for thousands of years  the  human  body  has served  as a model  for the
            universe,  from the theory of macrocosm  and microcosm to the physiognomic
            teachings of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This traditional metamodel
            has evolved from the intact body of the Middle Ages to the dismembered corpse of
            the nineteenth century. The idea of montage as the specific basis of a new art,
            cinema, is an important link in the long history of this evolution.
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74