Page 322 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 322

L1644_C07.fm  Page 292  Monday, October 20, 2003  12:10 PM









                                               3
                                    (persons.mg/m .yr/kg). It should be mentioned that the impact indicators for  the
                                    heavy metals As, Cd and Ni, as well as for benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), are supposed to
                                    be the same as for PM . It is assumed that these substances are adsorbed on particles
                                                     2.5
                                    of PM 2.5  and therefore behave in the same terms of fate and exposure. However, the
                                    DALY value is specific for each substance because the dose–response and expo-
                                    sure–response functions are substance specific as well.
                                       The ozone value is taken as country average from Krewitt et al., (2001). The
                                    values for nitrate and sulfate do not differ because these are secondary pollutants
                                    for which country averages have been calculated. Only the value for the sulfate
                                    in the first row differs slightly, due to the stack height of the MSWI (50 m), which
                                    differs from the one of the transport processes (5 m stack height). The  highest
                                    values for the primary pollutants appear in Madrid and the lowest in the small
                                    town of Huesca. These values are calculated according to the expression described
                                    in Section 7.6.5 for the transfer of impact factors to other regions. In comparison
                                    to Catalonia, Madrid is densely populated and Huesca is scarcely populated, so
                                    these results are obvious.

                                    7.7.6  DAMAGE PROFILE
                                    Table 7.13 shows the damage matrix for Scenario 1 (former situation) resulting from
                                    the multiplication of the eco-technology matrix (Table 7.11) and the damage-assign-
                                    ing matrix (Table 7.12). If the first column is considered, the  first box (the first
                                    element of the diagonal) represents the damage for the MSWI. The second element
                                    in the second column represents the damage for the transport in district class I B
                                    and so on. If one leaves the diagonal, the impact of the processes at (fictitious) other
                                    locations is shown. For example, the last element of the first column shows the
                                    damage of the waste incinerator if it were to be located in Madrid. Of course, it
                                    must be admitted that the impact indicator applied to this cell refers to a stack height
                                    of 5 m (transport) rather than to 50 m (MSWI), in which the damage would be twice
                                    as high as it is currently. Nevertheless, this provides an impressive demonstration
                                    of the importance of spatial differentiation.
                                       Next, the diagonal elements of the damage matrix are added to obtain the damage
                                    profile, then the part corresponding to transport is compared with the value of the
                                    waste incinerator. In this way the damages due to the waste incinerator and the
                                    transport can be compared.
                                       The most obvious result of this environmental damage estimation study for
                                    industrial process chains is that the contribution of transport to the overall damage
                                    increases significantly from Scenario 1 over Scenarios 2 and 3. On the one hand,
                                    this is due to the sharp decrease of the overall damage and, on the other, the decrease
                                    of damage due to the improvement of flue gas treatment is partly compensated for
                                    by the additional transport processes.
                                       From the results of all scenarios it can be seen that the ratio between the damage
                                    due to transport and the overall damage is in the same magnitude for all chosen
                                    indicators in this study (PE and DALY). Whether the contribution of transport to
                                    the overall result is more significant for the population exposure or DALY in the
                                    case of each pollutant depends on the relationship between the toxicity and the mass



                                    © 2004 CRC Press LLC
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327