Page 262 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 262

212                                       Intelligent Digital Oil and Gas Fields


             The many model and asset parameters of IAMod and IAM workflows are
          uncertain. This uncertainty introduces a new level of complexity in the opti-
          mization process, because optimization functions and/or constraints are no
          longer deterministic functions but probabilistic/stochastic distributions.
          However, if statistical principles are considered, the optimization frame-
          works as discussed above can be modified to incorporate stochastic func-
          tions.  In  reservoir  characterization,  an  example  of  uncertainty
          quantification may represent a set (ensemble) of model realizations, each
          of them honoring a set of historic data. In retrospect, a stochastic production
          optimization problem may represent maximization of expected NPV over
          all available realizations. Note that the statistical nature of such a problem
          will render the mean (expected) NPV value with associated confidence
          intervals; however, the optimization will require many reservoir flow sim-
          ulations and may be prohibitively time consuming. Echeverria Ciaurri et al.
          (2012) propose the approach of retrospective optimization (RO), which
          replaces a stochastic optimization problem by a sequence of optimization
          problems where constraining statistics are approximated with gradually
          increasing levels of quality.
             An alternative approach is the use of stochastic programming (SP)
          (Nemirovski et al., 2009) where the optimization problem with objective
          function F 0 (x) formulates as follows:

                        minimize F 0 xðÞ ¼ Ef 0 x, ωð  Þ
                                                                       (6.6)
                        subject to F i xðÞ ¼ Ef i x, ωð  Þ   0, i ¼ 1,…,m

          where E represents the expected value operator on objective and constrain
          functions f i (x,ω), which depend on x and ω, optimization and random vari-
          ables, respectively. The value of ω is not known, but its distribution is and
          the goal is to select x so that constraints are satisfied on average or with high
          probability and the objective is minimized on average or with high proba-
          bility. The stochastic constraint E f(x)<0 is classified as a standard quadratic
          inequality.
             It is interesting to note that neither RO nor SP are markedly represented
          in the area of oil and gas production optimization problems. However, the
          E&P industry has been rapidly adopting a complementary ensemble-based
          approach to assisted history matching (AHM) with uncertainty, using for
          example Bayesian inversion techniques such as ensemble Kalman filter
          (EnKF) (Evensen, 1994), ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation
          (ES-MDA) (Emerick and Reynolds, 2013), or sequential, Markov-chain
   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267