Page 329 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 329

274                                       Intelligent Digital Oil and Gas Fields


             injection at different time steps (preferably every 4months). This capa-
             bility means that the waterfront location between wells can now be esti-
             mated and thus water breakthrough can be delayed with high accuracy,
             compared with proactive control. The ICV settings can be changed
             depending on the waterfront movement. For example, when the water-
             front is approaching the wellbore, the ICV in the segment can be
             completely off, which maximizes the oil-sweep efficiency. The philos-
             ophy is based on trusted 4D seismic processing and interpretation, and
             how the 3D numerical model captures the seismic data. Passive control
             is the most sophisticated control because it can be used at the right time
             with the right tool. However, the use of 4D seismic and this control is
             very expensive and requires extensive seismic data and interpretation.
          Cullick and Sukkestad (2010) have modeled smart wells by applying ICVs in
          complex well architectures including multilaterals wells. They compared the
          production performance by using a well completion without an ICV (open-
          hole completion), reactive control (fixed policy), and proactive control
          (optimized policy). Fig. 7.16 shows the results of different control modes.
          The fixed policy is an optimization technique that runs the simulation model
          and checks water cut value in each simulation’s time step against the thresh-
          old. If the threshold is met or exceeded (e.g., 80% of water cut), the valve
          setting is reduced by one unit. The process is continued until the ICV is fully
          closed. With the optimized policy, a set of threshold ranges and increment
          sets are provided and they are used as optimizer to control the 3D numerical
          model. The optimizer seeks a combination of triggers and increments that
          maximizes the oil-recovery factor while it reduces both water production
          and injection. Each valve has its own best threshold trigger water cut and

















          Fig. 7.16 Production profiles for no ICV, reactive (fixed policy), and proactive (optimized
          policy) controls in a horizontal well with three ICVs. (Taken with permission from SPE
          126246.)
   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334