Page 144 -
P. 144

Table 4.1  (Continued)
                         ----
          Problems:
           Flaming: When a user writes incensed angry email expressed in uninhibited language that is much stronger
           than normally used when interacting with the same person face to face. This includes the use of impolite
           statements, exclamation marks, capitalized sentences or words, swearing, and superlatives. Such "charged"
           communication can lead to misunderstandings and bad feelings among the recipients.
           Overload: Many people experience message overload, receiving over 30 emails or other messages a day.
           They find it difficult to cope and may overlook an important message while working through their ever
           increasing pile of email-especially if  they have not read it for a few days. Various interface mechanisms
           have been designed to help people manage their email better, including filtering, threading, and the use of
           signaling to indicate the level of importance of  a message (via the sender or recipient), through color coding,
           bold font, or exclamation marks placed beside a message.
           False expectations: An assumption has evolved that people will read their messages several times a day and
           reply to them there and then. However, many people have now reverted to treating email more like postal
           mail, replying when they have the time to do so.
         iii. CMC combined with other activity
         People often talk with each other while carrying out other activities. For example, designing requires people to
         brainstorm together in meetings, drawing on whiteboards, making notes, and using existing designs. Teaching
         involves talking with students as well as writing on the board and getting students to solve problems
         collaboratively. Various meeting- and decision- support systems have been developed to help people work or
         learn while talking together.
          Examples:
           Customized electronic meeting rooms have been built that support people in face-to-face meetings, via the
           use of networked workstations, large public displays, and shared software tools, together with various
           techniques to help decision-making. One of  the earliest systems was the University of  Arizona's
           Groupsystem (see Figure 4.2).



                               --   - -     -
                        White board   Wall mounted projectioiscreen   White board

                                   Facilitator console
                                   and network
                                   file server




                                                                 \
                                                                 Work
                                                                 /









                        Figure 4.2 Schematic diagram of  a group meeting room, showing relationship of  work-
                        station, whiteboards and video projector.
                                                                                      (Continued)
                                                                                            113
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149