Page 268 - Intro to Tensor Calculus
P. 268

262



               Differentiate this expression with respect to x k and verify the result
                                                      2
                                                     ∂ u i    ∂e ij  ∂ω ij
                                                           =      +     .                             (2.4.52)
                                                    ∂x j ∂x k  ∂x k  ∂x k
               We further assume that the displacement field is continuous so that the mixed partial derivatives are equal
               and
                                                        2         2
                                                       ∂ u i     ∂ u i
                                                             =        .                               (2.4.53)
                                                      ∂x j ∂x k  ∂x k ∂x j
               Interchanging j and k in equation (2.4.52) gives us
                                                      2
                                                     ∂ u i   ∂e ik  ∂ω ik
                                                           =      +     .                             (2.4.54)
                                                    ∂x k ∂x j  ∂x j  ∂x j
               Equating the second derivatives from equations (2.4.54) and (2.4.52) and rearranging terms produces the
               result
                                                  ∂e ij  ∂e ik  ∂ω ik  ∂ω ij
                                                      −      =      −                                 (2.4.55)
                                                  ∂x k   ∂x j   ∂x j   ∂x k
                                                       ∂ω ik  ∂ω ij  ∂ω jk
                   Making the observation that ω ij satisfies  −    =       , the equation (2.4.55) simplifies to the
                                                        ∂x j  ∂x k    ∂x i
               form
                                                     ∂e ij  ∂e ik  ∂ω jk
                                                         −      =      .                              (2.4.56)
                                                     ∂x k   ∂x j   ∂x i
               The term involving ω jk can be eliminated by using the mixed partial derivative relation
                                                        2         2
                                                      ∂ ω jk    ∂ ω jk
                                                             =         .                              (2.4.57)
                                                      ∂x i ∂x m  ∂x m ∂x i
                   To derive the compatibility equations we differentiate equation (2.4.56) with respect to x m and then
               interchanging the indices i and m and substitute the results into equation (2.4.57). This will produce the
               compatibility equations
                                             2        2         2        2
                                            ∂ e ij   ∂ e mk    ∂ e ik   ∂ e mj
                                                  +        −         −        =0.                     (2.4.58)
                                          ∂x m ∂x k  ∂x i ∂x j  ∂x m ∂x j  ∂x i ∂x k
               This is a set of 81 partial differential equations which must be satisfied by the strain components. Fortunately,
               due to symmetry considerations only 6 of these 81 equations are distinct. These 6 distinct equations are
               known as the St. Venant’s compatibility equations and can be written as
                                                2         2       2        2
                                               ∂ e 11    ∂ e 12  ∂ e 23   ∂ e 31
                                                     =         −      +
                                              ∂x 2 ∂x 3  ∂x 1 ∂x 3  ∂x 1 2  ∂x 1 ∂x 2
                                                2         2       2        2
                                               ∂ e 22    ∂ e 23  ∂ e 31   ∂ e 12
                                                     =         −      +
                                              ∂x 1 ∂x 3  ∂x 2 ∂x 1  ∂x 2 2  ∂x 2 ∂x 3
                                                2         2       2        2
                                               ∂ e 33    ∂ e 31  ∂ e 12   ∂ e 23
                                                     =         −      +
                                              ∂x 1 ∂x 2  ∂x 3 ∂x 2  ∂x 3 2  ∂x 3 ∂x 1
                                                                                                      (2.4.59)
                                                2        2       2
                                               ∂ e 12   ∂ e 11  ∂ e 22
                                             2       =     2  +    2
                                              ∂x 1 ∂x 2  ∂x 2   ∂x 1
                                                2        2       2
                                               ∂ e 23   ∂ e 22  ∂ e 33
                                             2       =     2  +    2
                                              ∂x 2 ∂x 3  ∂x 3   ∂x 2
                                                2        2       2
                                               ∂ e 31   ∂ e 33  ∂ e 11
                                             2       =       +      .
                                                           2       2
                                              ∂x 3 ∂x 1  ∂x 1   ∂x 3
               Observe that the fourth compatibility equation is the same as that derived in the example 2.4-3.
                   These compatibility equations can also be expressed in the indicial form
                                              e ij,km + e mk,ji − e ik,jm − e mj,ki =0.               (2.4.60)
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273