Page 108 - Introduction to Information Optics
P. 108

2.5. Image Processing with Optics           93

       2.5.2. IMAGE RESTORATION

          One of the most interesting applications in optical processing is image
       restoration. As contrasted with the optimum correlation detection that uses the
       maximum signal-to-noise ratio criterion, for optimum image restoration one
       uses the minimum mean-square error criterion. Since this restoration spatial
       filter is restricted by the same physical constraints as Eqs. (2.28) and (2.29), we
       will discuss the synthesis of a practical filter that avoids the optimization. In
       other words, the example provided in the following is by no means optimum.
          We know that a distorted image can be, in principle, restored by an inverse
       filter, as given by


                                                                      (2-55)


       where D(p) represents the distorting spectral distribution. In other words, a
       distorted image, as described in the Fourier domain, can be written as



                                  G(p) = S(p)D(p),

       where G(p) and S(p) are the distorted and undistorted image spectral distribu-
       tions, respectively. Thus, we see that an image can be restored by inverse
       filtering, such as

                                 S(p) = G(p)H(p).                    (2.56)

       Let us now assume that the transmission function of a linear srneared-point
       (blurred) image can be written as



                                  0, otherwise,

       where A£ is the smeared length. To restore the image, we seek for an inverse
       filter as given by

                                                                      ,-
                                                                      (1


       In view of the preceding equation, we quickly note that the filter is not
       physically realizable, since it has an infinite number of poles. This precisely
       corresponds to some information loss due to smearing. In other words, to
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113