Page 314 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 314

13: SOMA LIGNITE BASIN, TURKEY  297


                 500-m centers to establish the resource poten-  is lost during drilling there is no way of deter-
                 tial of the basin.                           mining the quality of the lost core and often the
                   The second exploration program was super-  better quality, more brittle, bright sections are
                 vised by Otto Gold GmbH. Open-hole drilling  lost on these occasions. It is usual to have a
                 was used with predetermined intervals cored  drilling contract that requires the drillers to
                 to include lignite seams. Lignite cores were  recover at least 95% of the core in the seam.
                 analyzed for ash and moisture content, and   Recoveries less than this (within reason) usu-
                 calorific value. The sulfur and volatile content  ally require redrilling. Techniques that help
                 were determined on a few samples. The pro-   to improve core recoveries include the use of
                 gram was designed to identify lateral and    large diameter wireline (see section 10.3.2)
                 down-dip lignite limits, as well as to undertake  or air flush core barrels (e.g. HQ series with
                 infill drilling at 250 m centers within the basin.  a nominal hole diameter of 96.1 mm) and the
                   TKI initiated the third drilling program as  use of triple tube core barrels (Cummings &
                 part of their preliminary mine feasibility study.  Wickland 1985, Berkman 2001).
                 They also used rotary drilling techniques with
                 spot coring. Full proximate analyses and calo-
                 rific value determinations were done on these  13.2.3 Geophysical logging
                 cores, and occasionally sulfur analyses. These  Down-the-hole (DTH) geophysical logging (see
                 holes were drilled to obtain additional informa-  section 7.13) was first used in the oil industry
                 tion in areas of structural complexity or areas  but soon found its way into coal exploration
                 with a paucity of data. TKI produced isopach,  (Ellis 1988). It is now used routinely in the
                 structure contour, isoquality, and polygonal  evaluation of coal deposits because geophysical
                 reserve maps, as well as reserve tables, surface  logs can help reduce drilling costs by enabling
                 and underground mine plans, manpower sched-  the use of cheaper, rotary, open-hole drilling
                 ules, etc.                                   of, say, 80% of the holes. Good comparison
                   A fourth drilling program was carried out  of open hole and cored holes is achieved with
                 during the feasibility study. Five of the holes  the use of DTH logs. They can also help
                 were fully cored for geotechnical studies,   in identifying the top and bottom of the
                 while the remainder were rotary drilled and  seams, partings within the seams, lithological
                 spot cored. Lignite cores were analyzed for  changes, in checking on core recovery and the
                 proximates, calorific value, and specific grav-  depth of each hole, and ensuring that drillers do
                 ity. Hardgrove grindability tests (section 13.6)  not claim for more meters than they actually
                 and size analyses were also carried out on   drilled. Seams often have characteristic geo-
                 samples from the existing open pit. Although  physical signatures which, in structurally com-
                 122 boreholes were drilled, only 83 of them  plex areas, can help with seam correlation.
                 intersected the lowest lignite seam, or the hori-  Typical DTH geophysical logs used on coal
                 zon at which the equivalent of the lignite seam  and lignite exploration programs are natural
                 occurred. This was due to common drilling    gamma, density, neutron, caliper, and resistiv-
                 problems such as loss or sticking of rods in the  ity, as well as sonic and slim line dip meter logs
                 hole, or burning the bit in at zones of serious  (Ellis 1988). Shale, mudstone, and marl usually
                 and sudden water loss. This resulted in an over-  have a high natural gamma response while coal
                                        −2
                 all density of 11 holes km , equivalent to a rec-  has a low response, with sharp contacts often
                 tangular grid roughly 330 m × 250 m, although  being observed. Coarsening-upward or fining-
                 some holes are closer and some farther apart  upward sequences in the clastic sections of the
                 than this. This is considered to have given suf-  logs can also be inferred from the gamma logs.
                 ficient density to classify the lignite in terms  The density log, as its name implies, reflects
                 of measured (= proved) reserves (USGS 1976).  the change in density of the rocks, with coal
                                                              and lignite having low densities and shale and
                                                              sandstone having higher densities. The neu-
                 13.2.2 Core recovery
                                                              tron tool is used in estimating porosity, and the
                 One of the major problems of assessing lignite  resistivity tool may be used to indicate bed
                 or coal deposits is that of core recovery. If core  boundaries. The caliper tool defines the size of
   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319