Page 47 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 47

30   A.M. EVANS



                  improve their accuracy for that particular min-
                  eral deposit type. The American Geological
                  Institute Data Sheets (sheet 15.1) and various
                  books (Spock 1953, Thorpe & Brown 1985,
                  Tucker 1988, Barnes & Lisle 2003 and others)
                  have comparison charts to help the field geo-        (a)                    (b)
                  logist in estimating percentage compositions
                  in hand specimens.

                  2.2.4 Economic significance of textures

                  Mineral interlocking
                                                                      (c)
                  Ores are crushed during milling to liberate                                (d)
                  the various minerals from each other (section
                  2.2.3) and for concentration a valuable mineral
                  has to be reduced to less than its liberation size
                  in order to separate it from its surrounding
                  gangue. Crushing and grinding of rock is expen-
                  sive and if the grain size of a mineral is below
                  about 0.05 mm the cost may well be higher
                  than the value of the liberated constituents.
                  In addition there are lower limits to the degree
                  of milling possible dictated by the separation      (e)                    (f)
                  processes to be employed because these are
                  most effective over certain grain size ranges:  FIG. 2.2  (a)–(d) Grains from a mineral dressing plant.
                  e.g. magnetic separation, 0.02–2.5 mm; froth  (a) Granular texture; black represents an ore
                                                              mineral, unornamented represents gangue (×0.6). (b)
                  flotation, 0.01–0.3 mm; electrostatic separa-  A pyrite grain veined by chalcopyrite (black) (×177).
                  tion, 0.12–1.4 mm.                          (c) A sphalerite grain containing small rounded
                    In Fig. 2.2 a number of intergrowth patterns  inclusions of chalcopyrite (black) (×133).
                  are illustrated. Further crushing of the granular  (d) Pyrite grain coated with supergene chalcocite
                  textured grains in (a) will give good separation  (black) (×233). (e) Grains of pyrrhotite with exsolved
                  of ore (black) from gangue – this is an ideal tex-  granular pentlandite in the interstices and flame
                  ture from the processing point of view. In (b)  exsolution bodies within the pyrrhotite (×57).
                  further crushing of the tiny pyrite grain veined  (f) Exsolution blades of ilmenite in a magnetite
                  by chalcopyrite (black) is out of the question   grain (×163).
                  and this copper will be lost to the tailings.
                  The chalcopyrite (black) occurring as spheroids
                  in sphalerite grains (c) is too small to be liber-  ing to the amount by which they fall below
                  ated and will go as a copper loss into the zinc  the contracted grade. Exsolution textures com-
                  concentrate. The grain of pyrite coated with  monly devalue ores by locking up ore minerals
                  supergene chalcocite (black) in (d) will, during  and by introducing impurities. In (e) the tiny
                  froth flotation, carry the pyrite as a diluting  flame-shaped exsolution bodies of pentlandite
                  impurity into the copper concentrate. The   (black) in the pyrrhotite grain will go with the
                  grain is too small for separation of the two  pyrrhotite into the tailings and the ilmenite
                  minerals by crushing. It must be noted that  bodies (black) in magnetite (f) are likewise too
                  the market price for a metal does not apply  small to be liberated by further grinding and
                  fully or directly to concentrates. The purchase  will contaminate the magnetite concentrate. If
                  terms quoted by a custom smelter are usually  this magnetite is from an ilmenite orebody
                  based on a nominal concentrate grade and    then these interlocked ilmenite bodies will be a
                  lower concentrate grades are penalized accord-  titanium loss.
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52