Page 165 - Introduction to Paleobiology and The Fossil Record
P. 165

152  INTRODUCTION TO PALEOBIOLOGY AND THE FOSSIL RECORD



                      modern and ancient biological structures (Fig.   principles of movement, clarify the nature
                      6.11). A simple example is to consider the      of the joint, and the positioning and relative
                      vertebrate jaw as a lever, with the jaw joint as   forces of the muscles. Such real-life
                      the fulcrum (Fig. 6.11c). Simple mechanics      models may also form the basis for educa-
                      shows that the bite will be strongest nearest   tional demonstrations and museum recon-
                      to the fulcrum, and weakest towards the far     structions. More commonly now, however,
                      end: that is why we bite food off at the front   paleobiologists do their modeling on the
                      of our jaws but chew at the back. Subtle        computer.
                      changes to the positions of the jaw muscles       Some computer modeling has been very
                      and the relative position of the jaw margin     effective in studying the mechanical strength
                      with respect to the fulcrum can then improve    of ancient structures. In particular, paleobiol-

                      the efficiency of the bite. The vertebrate limb   ogists have begun looking at the skulls of
                      can be modeled as a series of cranks, each      ancient vertebrates to assess how the structure
                      with a characteristic range of movement at      was shaped by the normal stresses and strains
                      the joints. This kind of model allows the       of feeding and head-butting. A useful model-

                      analyst to work out the maximum forwards        ing approach is finite element analysis (FEA),
                      and backwards bend of the limb and the rela-    a well-established method used by engineers
                      tive scaling of muscles, for example.           to assess the strength of bridges and buildings
                        Biomechanical models may be real, three-      before they are built, and now applied to
                      dimensional models made out of steel rods,      dinosaur skulls (Box 6.5), among other fossil
                      bolts and rubber bands. Such models can         problems. FEA is one of many methods of
                      provide powerful confirmation of the basic       modeling how forces act on biological struc-








                               Box 6.4  The Triassic tow-net

                        For a century or more, fossil hunters had been aware of some astonishing fossils from the Jurassic
                        of Germany that showed long, slender crinoids (see p. 395) attached to driftwood. In life, these cri-
                        noids must have dangled beneath the driftwood, and their mode of life was a mystery. Driftwood
                        crinoids have now been identified in many parts of the world, from the Devonian onwards.

                           Crinoids today can live attached to the seabed, as most of their fossil ancestors did, fi ltering food
                        particles from the bottom waters. Most living crinoids are free-swimmers, but they do not seem to
                        attach to driftwood. So why did the fossil forms do it, and how did they live?
                           New discoveries from China (Hagdorn et al. 2007) give some clues. Numerous pieces of driftwood

                        have been identified in the Late Triassic Xiaowa Formation of Guizhou, southwest China, each car-
                        rying 10 or more beautiful specimens of the crinoid Traumatocrinus (Fig. 6.10a). The juveniles were
                        presumably free-swimming microscopic plankton, as with other echinoderms, and they settled on
                        driftwood logs. Many juveniles have been found on the logs. The crinoids then matured and became
                        very long. Their feeding arms were longer than in seabed crinoids, perhaps to capture more food.

                        This floating mode of life has been termed pseudoplanktonic, meaning that the crinoids are living
                        like “fake plankton”. They probably fared better up in the oxygenated surface waters than in the
                        black anoxic seabed ooze.
                           The functional interpretation of a Traumatocrinus colony (Fig. 6.10b) is that it worked like a

                        tow-net (Fig. 6.10c), a standard kind of fishing net towed in the open sea. As the boat moves forward,
                        the tow-net hangs passively behind and billows outward. Any fishes encountered are caught. The

                        Traumatocrinus colony similarly spread its feeding arms passively as the log moved forward in the
                        gentle Triassic sea currents. Any food particle encountered by the crinoid net would be captured and
                        eaten. Paleontologists have to use their imaginations and intellects in fi nding plausible functional
                        models for some ancient organisms!
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170