Page 26 - Introduction to Paleobiology and The Fossil Record
P. 26
PALEONTOLOGY AS A SCIENCE 13
debated whether there was a progression from such a principle applied to all animals, that
simple organisms in the most ancient rocks to the surviving individuals would be those that
more complex forms later. The leading British were best fitted to obtain food and to produce
geologist, Charles Lyell (1797–1875), was an healthy young, and that their particular adap-
antiprogressionist. He believed that the fossil tations would be inherited. This was Darwin’s
record showed no evidence of long-term, one- theory of evolution by natural selection, the
way change, but rather cycles of change. He core of modern evolutionary thought.
would not have been surprised to fi nd evi- The theory was published 21 years after
dence of human fossils in the Silurian, or for Darwin first formulated the idea, in his book
dinosaurs to come back at some time in the On the Origin of Species (1859). The delay
future if the conditions were right. was a result of Darwin’s fear of offending
Progressionism was linked to the idea of established opinion, and of his desire to bolster
evolution. The first serious considerations of his remarkable insight with so many support-
evolution took place in 18th century France, ing facts that no one could deny it. Indeed,
in the work of naturalists such as the Comte most scientists accepted the idea of evolution
de Buffon (1707–1788) and Jean-Baptiste by common descent in 1859, or soon after,
Lamarck (1744–1829). Lamarck explained but very few accepted (or understood) natural
the phenomenon of progressionism by a large- selection. It was only after the beginning of
scale evolutionary model termed the “Great modern genetics early in the 20th century, and
Chain of Being” or the Scala naturae. He its amalgamation with “natural history”
believed that all organisms, plants and (systematics, ecology, paleontology) in the
animals, living and extinct, were linked in 1930s and 1940s, in a movement termed the
time by a unidirectional ladder leading from “Modern synthesis”, that Darwinian evolu-
simplest at the bottom to most complex at the tion by natural selection became fully
top, indeed, running from rocks to angels. established.
Lamarck argued that the Scala was more of
a moving escalator than a ladder; that in
time present-day apes would rise to become PALEONTOLOGY TODAY
humans, and that present-day humans
were destined to move up to the level of Dinosaurs and fossil humans
angels. Much of 19th century paleontology was dom-
inated by remarkable new discoveries. Collec-
tors fanned out all over the world, and
Darwinian evolution
knowledge of ancient life on Earth increased
Charles Darwin (1809–1882) developed the enormously. The public was keenly interested
theory of evolution by natural selection in the then, as now, in spectacular new discoveries
1830s by abandoning the usual belief that of dinosaurs. The first isolated dinosaur
species were fixed and unchanging. Darwin bones were described from England and
realized that individuals within species showed Germany in the 1820s and 1830s, and tenta-
considerable variation, and that there was not tive reconstructions were made (Fig. 1.9).
a fixed central “type” that represented the However, it was only with the discovery of
essence of each species. He also emphasized complete skeletons in Europe and North
the idea of evolution by common descent, America in the 1870s that a true picture of
namely that all species today had evolved these astonishing beasts could be presented.
from other species in the past. The problem The fi rst specimen of Archaeopteryx, the
he had to resolve was to explain how the oldest bird, came to light in 1861: here was a
variation within species could be harnessed to true “missing link”, predicted by Darwin only
produce evolutionary change. 2 years before.
Darwin found the solution in a book Darwin hoped that paleontology would
published in 1798 by Thomas Malthus provide key evidence for evolution; he
(1766–1834), who demonstrated that human expected that, as more finds were made, the
populations tend to increase more rapidly fossils would line up in long sequences
than the supplies of food. Hence, only the showing the precise pattern of common
stronger can survive. Darwin realized that descent. Archaeopteryx was a spectacular