Page 26 - Introduction to Paleobiology and The Fossil Record
P. 26

PALEONTOLOGY AS A SCIENCE  13


             debated whether there was a progression from    such a principle applied to all animals, that
             simple organisms in the most ancient rocks to   the surviving individuals would be those that

             more complex forms later. The leading British   were best fitted to obtain food and to produce
             geologist, Charles Lyell (1797–1875), was an    healthy young, and that their particular adap-
             antiprogressionist. He believed that the fossil   tations would be inherited. This was Darwin’s
             record showed no evidence of long-term, one-    theory of evolution by natural selection, the
             way change, but rather cycles of change. He     core of modern evolutionary thought.
             would not have been surprised to fi nd  evi-       The theory was published 21 years after

             dence of human fossils in the Silurian, or for   Darwin first formulated the idea, in his book
             dinosaurs to come back at some time in the      On the Origin of Species (1859). The delay
             future if the conditions were right.            was a result of Darwin’s fear of offending
               Progressionism was linked to the idea of      established opinion, and of his desire to bolster

             evolution. The first serious considerations of   his remarkable insight with so many support-
             evolution took place in 18th century France,    ing facts that no one could deny it. Indeed,
             in the work of naturalists such as the Comte    most scientists accepted the idea of evolution
             de Buffon (1707–1788) and Jean-Baptiste         by common descent in 1859, or soon after,
             Lamarck (1744–1829). Lamarck explained          but very few accepted (or understood) natural
             the phenomenon of progressionism by a large-    selection. It was only after the beginning of
             scale evolutionary model termed the “Great      modern genetics early in the 20th century, and
             Chain of Being” or the Scala naturae. He        its amalgamation with “natural history”
             believed that all organisms, plants and         (systematics, ecology, paleontology) in the
             animals, living and extinct, were linked in     1930s and 1940s, in a movement termed the
             time by a unidirectional ladder leading from    “Modern synthesis”, that Darwinian evolu-
             simplest at the bottom to most complex at the   tion by natural selection became fully
             top, indeed, running from rocks to angels.      established.
             Lamarck argued that the Scala was more of
             a moving escalator than a ladder; that in
             time present-day apes would rise to become      PALEONTOLOGY TODAY
             humans, and that present-day humans
             were destined to move up to the level of        Dinosaurs and fossil humans
             angels.                                         Much of 19th century paleontology was dom-
                                                             inated by remarkable new discoveries. Collec-
                                                             tors fanned out all over the world, and
             Darwinian evolution
                                                             knowledge of ancient life on Earth increased
             Charles Darwin (1809–1882) developed the        enormously. The public was keenly interested
             theory of evolution by natural selection in the   then, as now, in spectacular new discoveries

             1830s by abandoning the usual belief that       of dinosaurs. The first isolated dinosaur

             species were fixed and unchanging. Darwin        bones were described from England and
             realized that individuals within species showed   Germany in the 1820s and 1830s, and tenta-
             considerable variation, and that there was not   tive reconstructions were made (Fig. 1.9).

             a fixed central “type” that represented the      However, it was only with the discovery of
             essence of each species. He also emphasized     complete skeletons in Europe and North
             the idea of evolution by common descent,        America in the 1870s that a true picture of
             namely that all species today had evolved       these astonishing beasts could be presented.
             from other species in the past. The problem     The fi rst  specimen  of  Archaeopteryx, the
             he had to resolve was to explain how the        oldest bird, came to light in 1861: here was a
             variation within species could be harnessed to   true “missing link”, predicted by Darwin only
             produce evolutionary change.                    2 years before.
               Darwin found the solution in a book             Darwin hoped that paleontology would
             published in 1798 by Thomas Malthus             provide key evidence for evolution; he
             (1766–1834), who demonstrated that human        expected that, as more finds were made, the

             populations tend to increase more rapidly       fossils would line up in long sequences
             than the supplies of food. Hence, only the      showing the precise pattern of common
             stronger can survive. Darwin realized that      descent.  Archaeopteryx was a spectacular
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31