Page 322 - Introduction to Paleobiology and The Fossil Record
P. 322

SPIRALIANS 1: LOPHOPHORATES  309


             number of quite different non-articulated and   p. 97). The progressive and sequential coloni-
             articulated taxa were cemented to the sub-      zation of Devonian spiriferids, by Spirorbis,
             strate, whereas some groups evolved clasping    itself a possible lophophorate (Taylor & Vinn
             spines to help stabilize their shells. In a number   2006),  Hederella,  Paleschara and  Aulopora
             of groups the pedicle atrophied during ontog-   marked the development of an eventual climax
             eny. Many taxa thus developed strategies        paleocommunity on the actual brachiopod
             involving inverted, pseudoinfaunal and recum-   shell itself. Were they feeding on incoming
             bent life modes; a number lived in cosupport-   brachiopod food or just waste? The general
             ive clusters and others mimicked corals. Not    view is that these animals congregated beside
             all brachiopods were sessile; a few, such as    the inhalant currents on the median parts of
             Lingula, adopted an  infaunal lifestyle (Box    the anterior commissure, and benefi ted from
             12.3), whereas the articulated forms Camer-     the indrawn particles of food. An alternative
             isma and Magadina were semi-infaunal.           view, and it is hard to prove or disprove, is
               Throughout the Phanerozoic the brachio-       that they were taking advantage of waste
             pods have participated in a spectrum of level-  being ejected from the brachiopod.
             bottom, benthic paleocommunities. Pioneer         Brachiopods not only acted as suitable sub-
             studies on Silurian brachiopods suggested that   strates for an epifauna, they were also prone
             their paleocommunities were depth related,      to attack (Box 12.4) and drill holes suggest
             and a predictable succession of faunas, each    predation and in some cases attachment of
             characterized by one or more key brachiopods,   other brachiopods themselves (Robinson &

             has been identified (Fig. 12.11). The onshore–   Lee 2008).
             offshore assemblages of the Lingula, Eocoelia,
             Pentamerus, Stricklandia (or its close relative
             Costistricklandia) and Clorinda paleocommu-     Brachiopods, functional morphology
             nities, fi rst identified in the Silurian of Wales,   and paradigms

             form the basis of benthic assemblage (BA)       Martin Rudwick, an English brachiopod
             zones 1–5, ranging from intertidal environ-     expert just beginning his career in the 1960s
             ments to the edge of the continental slope;     (he is now a distinguished historian of
             more basinal environments are included in       geology), proposed the paradigm approach in
             BA6. Parallel studies on Mesozoic brachio-      functional interpretation of fossils. His idea
             pods have, on the other hand, suggested that    was to create an engineering model for a func-
             brachiopod-dominated      paleocommunities      tion, such as water flow in feeding. For

             were controlled by substrate rather than depth   example, does the  costation, the zig-zag
             (Fig. 12.12). Clearly, in reality, a combination   pattern of ridges and furrows, of the anterior
             of these and other factors controlled the distri-  commissure of the brachiopod have a real

             butions of the Brachiopoda in a complex         functional significance? In numerical terms it
             system of suspension-feeding guilds.            can be shown that costation increases the
               Brachiopods have also acted as substrates     length of commissure and hence the intake
             for a variety of small epifaunal animals (see   area that may be held open without increasing






                        Box 12.3 Chinese lingulides

               Did early lingulides live in burrows like many of their descendants? Xianshanella haikouensis from
               the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna, South China was a subcircular animal with horny setae and
               a massive pedicle. Zhang Zhifei and his colleagues (2006) have shown that these earliest brachiopods
               did not live in burrows, but actually attached themselves to the shells of other invertebrates – an
               epibenthonic rather than infaunal mode of life (Fig. 12.10). Moreover the Chengjiang lingulide has
               a lophophore, a U-shaped digestive tract and an anteriorly-located anus; these advanced features
               were already present in the lingulate brachiopod lineage right from the start it seems.

                                                                                                 Continued
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327