Page 123 - Key Words in Religion Media and Culture
P. 123

106  David Morgan

             Passion of Jesus and not form mental images of it (Luther 1958: 99). John
             Calvin regarded images as the traffic of the mind but drew very different
             conclusions.  Whereas  Luther  urged  his  contemporaries  to  recognize  the
             value of images for teaching religious stories and precepts, Calvin claimed
             that images were unable to teach anything true about the Gospel (Calvin
             1989: 90–103). According to Calvin, images are not in the least inclined
             to tell the truth because they are the product of the human imagination,
             a  faculty  dedicated  to  dissimulation.  The  human  mind,  he  wrote,  is  a
             “perpetual forge of idols” (Calvin 1989: 97): by imagining the divine, the
             mind gives it a body the size of an image. The human propensity to lie was
             an epistemological issue, residing in the unholy linkage of rebellious will
             and creaturely cognition but sloshed over into the messy domain of bodies.
             To think was to appropriate the world to one’s interests, carnal and selfish,
             and therefore inevitably to limit the inherently transcendent and infinitely
             sovereign stature of the divine. If one wishes to know God, Calvin claimed,
             one has no choice but to rely faithfully on the medium by which the deity
             reveals itself: the Bible. Images were unlike words because they serviced the
             human will. The words of the Bible corresponded to those spoken by God
             himself, and were therefore privileged to convey divine truth.
               Romanticism and the Idealist philosophy that it embraced turned a sharp
             corner on Calvinism. Sociologist Colin Campbell has argued in an insightful
             study of the broad impact of Romanticism that modern consumerism was
             shaped by a hedonism that directed Europeans toward an imaginative pleasure-
             seeking (Campbell 1987). Yet Puritanism had also accorded a vital place to
             feelings, or affections, as theologians such as Jonathan Edwards referred to
             them. Affections, properly evaluated, could be evidence of the movement
             of the Holy Spirit—or of a sham undertaken by the wiles of Satan or the
             deceiving individual (Edwards 1959). The cultivation of feeling, directed by
             the faculty of taste, was Romanticism’s answer to the Calvinist evaluation
             of feelings. The legacy of the Puritan doctrine of the affections is evident
             in  the  nineteenth-century  evocation  of  emotions  in  illustrated  children’s
             publications. If Edwards debated with his parishioners whether a revived
             person’s panting or swooning were an index of spiritual awakening, Victorian
             Protestants disagreed over the effects of illustrations as moving or repulsive,
             compelling a solemn spirit or causing nightmares. The shift noted by Colin
             Campbell was toward the pivotal role of the imagination and the pleasure of
             feelings in the consumption of mass-produced goods. Accordingly, religion
             was not the victim of modern disenchantment but negotiated the transition
             to capitalism and consumption to great advantage. The explosion of mass
             print among Protestants and Catholics in the United States and Europe and
             among Christian missionaries and colonial governments throughout Asia and
             Africa during the nineteenth century and the aggressive use of imagery of all
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128